1964
DOI: 10.4315/0022-2747-27.2.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Standard Methods Procedure and a Surface Plate Method for Estimating Psychrophilic Bacteria in Milk1

Abstract: Summary Psychrophilic population levels were determined by Standard Methods procedure (1) and a surface plate method. Thirty-one samples of raw milk, 47 samples of commercial pasteurized milk, and 94 samples of milk containing pure cultures of selected psychrophiles were used in the comparisons. A statistical evaluation of the results indicated counts obtained by the surface plate method after incubation of the plates for five days at 6C were equivalent to counts obtained by the standard procedu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further differences between 6OC-14 d counts obtained after inoculation by the pour plate method and the Spiral Plate Maker may result from the contrasting availability of oxygen; anaerobic conditions may prevail in pour plates resulting in poor or arrested growth of psychrotrophs. This suggestion is supported by reports that the error and variability of counting methods are less for surface plating methods (Snyder, 1947), and also by the observation that growth occurs faster on plates which have undergone surface inoculation (Punch & Olson, 1964). The correlation between 21OC-25 h counts obtained by pour plate and 6OC-14 d counts by Spiral Plate Maker is higher than that for 21OC-25 h counts by Spiral Plate Maker and 6OC-14 d counts by pour plate (Table 3), again suggesting that the 6OC-14 d count by the pour plate method may underestimate the number of psychrotrophs present.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Comparison Of 21oc And 25 H With 6ocmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Further differences between 6OC-14 d counts obtained after inoculation by the pour plate method and the Spiral Plate Maker may result from the contrasting availability of oxygen; anaerobic conditions may prevail in pour plates resulting in poor or arrested growth of psychrotrophs. This suggestion is supported by reports that the error and variability of counting methods are less for surface plating methods (Snyder, 1947), and also by the observation that growth occurs faster on plates which have undergone surface inoculation (Punch & Olson, 1964). The correlation between 21OC-25 h counts obtained by pour plate and 6OC-14 d counts by Spiral Plate Maker is higher than that for 21OC-25 h counts by Spiral Plate Maker and 6OC-14 d counts by pour plate (Table 3), again suggesting that the 6OC-14 d count by the pour plate method may underestimate the number of psychrotrophs present.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Comparison Of 21oc And 25 H With 6ocmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The microbiological quality of fermented milk product was further assessed by spread plate method [19]. The Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar was used to detect and enumerate Enterobacteriaceae in fermented milk [19].…”
Section: Deermination Of Coliforms In Fermented Cattle Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbiological quality of fermented milk product was further assessed by spread plate method [19]. The Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar was used to detect and enumerate Enterobacteriaceae in fermented milk [19]. Briefly, 1 ml of the serial dilution was transferred to petri dishes using two plates for each dilution.…”
Section: Deermination Of Coliforms In Fermented Cattle Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse caso, os autores recomendam a contagem de cada ca que parece ser proveniente de uma fonte, como uma colÔnia. Em estudo comparativo, as contag efetuadas por esse método forneceram resultados com carga contaminante maior aquele de semeadura em profundidade, para algumas amostras36, 44,197,203. TYBRING 142 testaram 421 amostras de solução de uso oral, emprega teste preliminar.…”
unclassified