2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between standard and drift reducing nozzles for pesticide application in citrus: Part I. Effects on wind tunnel and field spray drift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, all curves showed continued decreased deposition as distance increased from 1 to 30 m, but the rate of decrease varied among the three treatments, keeping, though, a common trend for all treatments. Similar results in both vineyard and orchard experiments have also been found by other researchers [65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Sedimenting (Fallout) Spray Driftsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, all curves showed continued decreased deposition as distance increased from 1 to 30 m, but the rate of decrease varied among the three treatments, keeping, though, a common trend for all treatments. Similar results in both vineyard and orchard experiments have also been found by other researchers [65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Sedimenting (Fallout) Spray Driftsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, in all treatments, spray drift deposition decreased with increasing height above ground, especially at 5 m distance from the sprayed area. This shape of the airborne drift profile is similar to the profile described by other researches in orchards [67,74], while there are also studies in vineyards showing that the airborne spray drift deposition increased with increasing height [64]. This discrepancy is justified by the fact that spray drift amount depends heavily on the architecture and geometry of the canopy [75,76].…”
Section: Airborne Spray Driftsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This study emphasizes the advantage of the use of the tested DRN instead of STN during pesticide applications with axial fan airblast sprayers in citrus orchards, since drift was reduced (Torrent et al, 2016) and CRS control efficacy was not compromised under the conditions of the experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In conclusion DRN have been found to be a viable solution to reduce drift (Torrent et al, 2016) without compromising efficacy of pesticide applications against CRS in citrus under Mediterranean conditions, achieving similar number of scales per fruit, development of the number of scales per fruit through the season, distribution of the pest in the canopy and percentage of un-infested fruit or infested fruit with more than 3 scales or more than 10 scales at harvest. Furthermore the use of DRN did not affect the residue levels nor the population of Aphelinidae natural enemies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…778 Engineering tection work during the process of developing China's agricultural economy, because it is one of the important means to ensure high yield and stable yield of crops [1] [2] [3]. Currently, chemical control is the most effective prevention and treatment method among the three crop protection methods (physical control, chemical control, integrated control), and spraying agro-chemical pesticides is the most commonly used method in chemical control [4] [5] [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%