2019
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Integrated Genomic DNA/RNA Profiling and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Detection of MYC, BCL-2, and BCL-6 Gene Rearrangements in Large B-Cell Lymphomas

Abstract: Objectives To compare fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a commercially available sequencing assay for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to determine the best approach to identify gene rearrangements (GRs) in large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs). Methods Comparison of standard-of-care FISH assays (including a two-probe approach for MYC; break-apart and fusion probes) and an integrated genomic DNA/RNA sequencing CGP a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MYC break-apart FISH was performed on the cell block of this FNAB specimen and is depicted. Morphology and even immunohistochemistry are poor predictors of high-grade B-cell lymphoma- MYC/BCL2 , and FISH or other comparable fusion detection assay such as targeted or whole genome next generation sequencing ( 12 , 29 , 30 ), RNA based sequencing ( 31 ), or integrated DNA/RNA sequencing ( 32 ) must be performed to identify this important subset of large B-cell lymphoma ( 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MYC break-apart FISH was performed on the cell block of this FNAB specimen and is depicted. Morphology and even immunohistochemistry are poor predictors of high-grade B-cell lymphoma- MYC/BCL2 , and FISH or other comparable fusion detection assay such as targeted or whole genome next generation sequencing ( 12 , 29 , 30 ), RNA based sequencing ( 31 ), or integrated DNA/RNA sequencing ( 32 ) must be performed to identify this important subset of large B-cell lymphoma ( 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) DNA capture methods have been introduced for rearrangement detection in selected gene panels in FFPE samples, which makes it possible to detect breakpoints at base-pair resolution and identify translocation partner genes 7 10 . However, such methods rely on capturing unambiguous fusion-reads, which can be challenging when non-unique sequences flank the breakpoint 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 In recent years, targeted NGS has been increasingly used in clinical diagnosis and therapeutic guidance. Targeted NGS has the ability to detect precise break point locations and identify translocation partner genes, [8][9][10] while also providing additional mutation data with prognostic and therapeutic implications. In addition, large multigene panels could make targeted NGS a cost-effective option than FISH in the detection of DLBCL-associated rearrangements in terms of per-gene cost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%