2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762006000500005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for Anaplasma marginale antibodies with recombinant major surface protein 5 and initial body antigens

Abstract: Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on recombinant major surface protein 5 (rMSP5) and initial body (IB) antigens from a Brazilian isolate of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…If so, this is not in agreement with Araújo et al (2005), who found a sensitivity of 99% for this test, with sera from naturally-infected cattle, positive for antibodies to A. marginale by IFAT. Silva et al (2006) did not find differences in the performances of ELISAs with crude antigen and with MSP5 as antigens to detect antibodies to A. marginale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If so, this is not in agreement with Araújo et al (2005), who found a sensitivity of 99% for this test, with sera from naturally-infected cattle, positive for antibodies to A. marginale by IFAT. Silva et al (2006) did not find differences in the performances of ELISAs with crude antigen and with MSP5 as antigens to detect antibodies to A. marginale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In Brazil, the former agents are transmitted by Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, while the latter one, besides biological transmission by tick, can also be mechanically transmitted by hematophagous diptera (GUGLIELMONE, 1995). Epidemiological studies showed that, in Brazil, B. bovis, B. bigemina and A. marginale are endemic in several areas (ARA-ÚJO et al, 1998;SMITH et al, 2000;SOARES et al, 2000;SOUZA et al, 2000;MELO et al, 2001;ARAÚJO et al, 2005;BARROS et al, 2005, D'ANDREA et al, 2006. Other factor that may influence the distribution of these pathogens is breed, as B. indicus cattle, because of tick resistance, are less likely to be infected by ticks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The end point PCR was performed using the primers msp5F 5' ATGAGAATTTTCAAGATTGTGTCTAACCTT 3' and msp5R 5' AGGAAAGCCCCCAAAGCCCCATACTT 3', which delimit all msp5 genes of A. marginale, and a 3' untranslated region, according to Silva et al (2006), resulting in an amplicon of 714 bp. Amplification conditions were: 94°C for 4 minutes, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 minute, 60°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 45 seconds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum samples were from 72 Aberdeen-Angus cattle experimentally infected with Rio Grande do Norte homologous isolate of A. marginale; from 72 Anaplasmafree cattle, defined by PCR for MSP5 gene (Silva et al 2006); from 70 cattle naturally infected with this rickettsia from state of Alagoas, positive by indirect ELISA with MSP5 (Melo et al 2007); and from 72 seronegative cattle, all of which were analyzed by ELISAs with VirB9, VirB10, and EF-Tu for specific IgG.…”
Section: Amplification Of Virb9 Virb10 and Ef-tu -Primersmentioning
confidence: 99%