2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between homotopy perturbation method and optimal homotopy asymptotic method for the soliton solutions of Boussinesq–Burger equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is very difficult to solve nonlinear problems and in general it is often more difficult to get an analytic approximation than a numerical one for a given nonlinear problem. To overcoming the shortcomings, many new analytical techniques have been successfully developed by diverse groups of mathematicians and physicists, such as, Perturbation Method [1], Homotopy Perturbation Method [2], Modified Homotopy Perturbation Method [3,4], Rational Homotopy Perturbation Method [5], He's Homotopy Perturbation Method [6], Modified He's homotopy Perturbation Method [7], Asymptotic Method [8][9][10][11], Optimal Iteration Perturbation Method [12], Generalization of Modified Differential Transforms Method [13][14][15][16], and so on. Several other authors used many powerful analytical methods in the field of approximate solutions especially for strongly nonlinear oscillators like Max-Min Approach Method [17,18], Algebraic Method [19], Parameter Expansion Method and Variational Iteration Method [20][21][22], Amplitude Frequency Formulation Method [23], Energy Balance Method [24,25], He's Energy Balance Method [26,27], Rational Energy Balance Method [28], Rational Harmonic Balance Method [29], Residue Harmonic Balance Method [30][31][32][33], Newton-harmonic Balancing Approach [34], and so on for solving NDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very difficult to solve nonlinear problems and in general it is often more difficult to get an analytic approximation than a numerical one for a given nonlinear problem. To overcoming the shortcomings, many new analytical techniques have been successfully developed by diverse groups of mathematicians and physicists, such as, Perturbation Method [1], Homotopy Perturbation Method [2], Modified Homotopy Perturbation Method [3,4], Rational Homotopy Perturbation Method [5], He's Homotopy Perturbation Method [6], Modified He's homotopy Perturbation Method [7], Asymptotic Method [8][9][10][11], Optimal Iteration Perturbation Method [12], Generalization of Modified Differential Transforms Method [13][14][15][16], and so on. Several other authors used many powerful analytical methods in the field of approximate solutions especially for strongly nonlinear oscillators like Max-Min Approach Method [17,18], Algebraic Method [19], Parameter Expansion Method and Variational Iteration Method [20][21][22], Amplitude Frequency Formulation Method [23], Energy Balance Method [24,25], He's Energy Balance Method [26,27], Rational Energy Balance Method [28], Rational Harmonic Balance Method [29], Residue Harmonic Balance Method [30][31][32][33], Newton-harmonic Balancing Approach [34], and so on for solving NDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the basic ideas of optimal homotopy asymptotic method [11][12][13][14][15], consider the following general nonlinear differential equation…”
Section: Basic Idea Of Optimal Homotopy Asymptotic Methods (Oham)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various definitions and basic concept of fractional calculus are present in many books [1][2][3][4]. Therefore, several analytical and numerical methods were developed for solutions of fractional differential equations (both linear and nonlinear), among which Adomian's decomposition method [5][6][7], variation iteration method [8,9], homotopy perturbation method [10][11][12], homotopy analysis method [13][14][15], homotopy asymptotic method [16][17][18],differential transform method [19], and Galerkin method [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%