2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jher.2008.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between genetic algorithm and linear programming approach for real time operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientific literature proposes different methods, more related to statistical approaches, for optimizing irrigation scheduling and planning (Kuo and Liu, 2003;Negesh Kumar et al, 2006;Azamathulla et al, 2008;Porporato, 2011, 2013), while the application suggested in this paper takes into account actual measures of soil moisture and observed weather data in addition to updated forecasts to provide landowners with a suitable product for real-world farm profit optimization, as well as cost savings for irrigation practices: e.g. water volume, pumping system from ditches, fuel for tractors and labour costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific literature proposes different methods, more related to statistical approaches, for optimizing irrigation scheduling and planning (Kuo and Liu, 2003;Negesh Kumar et al, 2006;Azamathulla et al, 2008;Porporato, 2011, 2013), while the application suggested in this paper takes into account actual measures of soil moisture and observed weather data in addition to updated forecasts to provide landowners with a suitable product for real-world farm profit optimization, as well as cost savings for irrigation practices: e.g. water volume, pumping system from ditches, fuel for tractors and labour costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of easy formulation and application, the use of LP-based optimization models is very common in the management of water-resource problems (Bender et al 1984;Suryavanshi and Reddy 1986;Kumar and Pathak 1989;Ahlfeld and Heidari 1994;Vedula and Kumar 1996;Khare et al 2007;Azamathulla et al 2008;Lu et al 2011;Singh 2014e). However, NLP models have not been widely used because of rigorous mathematics involved in its development and the high computation time and memory required.…”
Section: Optimization Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned water-resources problems of irrigated agriculture have been solved by using a large number of simulation, optimization, and simulationoptimization models during the last few decades (Cheng et al 2000;Haouari and Azaiez 2001;Mantoglou et al 2004;Katsifarakis and Petala 2006;Konukcu et al 2006;Azamathulla et al 2008;Li et al 2011;Gaur et al 2011;Xie and Cui 2011). As far as the author is aware, there has not been a review of the individual and combined applications of simulation and optimization modeling for the management of groundwater resources associated with irrigated areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison purposes, the same model was solved by a technique based on calculus and the Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE) algorithm. Azamathulla et al (2008) developed and carried out a comparison of two modelsa Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Linear Programming (LP), to be applied to real-time reservoir operation in an existing Chiller reservoir system in Madhya Pradesh, India. Their performance is analysed, and from the results, the GA model is found to be superior to the LP model.…”
Section: Evolutionary Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%