2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Endovascular and Open Surgery for the Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to in-hospital mortality, it was higher for Open Surgery than Endovascular Procedures (5.0% v. 1.2%, p=0.008). These findings are in accordance with a recent meta-analysis of twenty-seven trials (seven randomized controlled trials and twenty retrospective trials), encompassing 17,536 patients, conducted by Tang et al, which found higher mortality during follow up (10.86% v. 7.54%, p<0.05) in the open surgery group (25). The Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial, which randomized 452 patients with severe limb ischemia due to infrainguinal disease to receive either a surgery-first or an angioplasty-first strategy, determined that at one-year open surgery and angioplasty did not differ significantly in amputation-free survival (71% bypass v. 68% angioplasty; adjusted HR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.49-1.07])( 26), but at 5-years follow up bypass surgery was associated with better overall survival (47% bypass v. 41% angioplasty; adjusted HR = 0.61; 95% CI [0.50-0.75]; P < 0.009) and a non-significant difference in amputation free survival (38% bypass v. 37% angioplasty; adjusted HR = 0.85; 95% CI [0.5-1.07]; P = 0.108) (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With regard to in-hospital mortality, it was higher for Open Surgery than Endovascular Procedures (5.0% v. 1.2%, p=0.008). These findings are in accordance with a recent meta-analysis of twenty-seven trials (seven randomized controlled trials and twenty retrospective trials), encompassing 17,536 patients, conducted by Tang et al, which found higher mortality during follow up (10.86% v. 7.54%, p<0.05) in the open surgery group (25). The Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial, which randomized 452 patients with severe limb ischemia due to infrainguinal disease to receive either a surgery-first or an angioplasty-first strategy, determined that at one-year open surgery and angioplasty did not differ significantly in amputation-free survival (71% bypass v. 68% angioplasty; adjusted HR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.49-1.07])( 26), but at 5-years follow up bypass surgery was associated with better overall survival (47% bypass v. 41% angioplasty; adjusted HR = 0.61; 95% CI [0.50-0.75]; P < 0.009) and a non-significant difference in amputation free survival (38% bypass v. 37% angioplasty; adjusted HR = 0.85; 95% CI [0.5-1.07]; P = 0.108) (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Of these, endovascular techniques have been widely adopted because of their safety, effectiveness, and reliability. 8 , 10 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tang et al 10 conducted a meta-analysis comparing the two types of procedures in patients with PAOD and demonstrated a significantly higher overall mortality rate for open procedures when compared to endovascular treatment (10.86% vs. 7.54%, respectively), in addition to a shorter length of hospital stay, lower rate of complications (9.48% vs. 13.60%), and lower amputation rate (12.49% vs. 18.28%) among patients treated with endovascular surgery when compared to those who underwent conventional surgery. However, there were no statistically significant differences in survival rates or limb salvage at 30-day, 1-year, or 3-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing angioplasty to the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is Case Report generally an inadequate treatment. It is characterized by a high degree of calcification of the SFA and the widespread involvement of the disease and a much higher prevalence of occlusion than stenosis [4] . There are a number of atherectomy devices for SFA disease including rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, and excisional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%