1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56827-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between depot and standard release triptoreline in in vitro fertilization: pituitary sensitivity, luteal function, pregnancy outcome, and perinatal results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constant GnRH agonist exposure results in down-regulating the pituitary GnRH receptor and de-coupling post receptor signaling mechanisms (4042). Long GnRH agonist protocols still have suppressed LH levels 9 days after the agonist was discontinued (43,44). This decreased LH pulsatility does not allow for adequate progesterone to be produced by the corpus luteum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constant GnRH agonist exposure results in down-regulating the pituitary GnRH receptor and de-coupling post receptor signaling mechanisms (4042). Long GnRH agonist protocols still have suppressed LH levels 9 days after the agonist was discontinued (43,44). This decreased LH pulsatility does not allow for adequate progesterone to be produced by the corpus luteum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It corresponds to the period necessary for the recovery of pituitary GnRH receptors and LH content. Its duration ranges from several weeks after injection of the long-acting form, to 5-8 days after daily injections of the short-acting form (20,21). This refractory period is observed even after a short course (7 days) of GnRH agonist administration (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a significant difference between both groups studied in endogenous FSH levels following downregulation and on the day of hCG administration, the latter one reflecting an increased FSH stimulation dose applied to compensate for inadequate ovarian response observed during the course of stimulation in the low serum LH group. This difference in intensity of pituitary suppression between depot and low-dose daily GnRHa is known, with FSH levels being generally more stable than LH levels (11,17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of LH available for ovarian stimulation depends on the intensity of pituitary suppression and the dose of exogenous LH. Differences in various GnRHa concerning intensity, onset and duration of pituitary suppression have been demonstrated previously (11)(12)(13). A recent meta-analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between patients treated with depot or daily GnRH agonists in terms of pregnancy rate, but number of gonadotrophin ampoules and duration of stimulation (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%