2015
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.59156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Between Cylinder and Tapered Implants in Delayed Immediate Placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
3
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the screw threads are different in both types of implants whereby the thread geometry of tapered implants leads to a higher surface area in contact with host tissue [45,46]. This may be the reason for the observation in this study which was also reported in other studies [45,46]. However, this contradicts the reports of other studies where there was no difference in the outcome based on implant shape [47,48].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the screw threads are different in both types of implants whereby the thread geometry of tapered implants leads to a higher surface area in contact with host tissue [45,46]. This may be the reason for the observation in this study which was also reported in other studies [45,46]. However, this contradicts the reports of other studies where there was no difference in the outcome based on implant shape [47,48].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…It has been reported that the insertion torque of tapered implants is more than that of cylindrical implants resulting in better primary stability in tapered implants [45]. Furthermore, the screw threads are different in both types of implants whereby the thread geometry of tapered implants leads to a higher surface area in contact with host tissue [45,46]. This may be the reason for the observation in this study which was also reported in other studies [45,46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the present study we used two-piece implant that had tapered body design which mimic more the natural root shape compared with the cylindrical implant design because the size of its diameter decrease towards the apical region which leads distribute forces into surrounding bone, created lateral compression of bone, increase the primary stability in low-density bone and less risk of labial perforation and this comes in agreement with other researches. And the most important thing about tapered design is to accommodate the labial concavity of anterior maxilla (14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tapered geometry, forces get diverted from the dense cortical bone to the resilient trabecular bone, which leads to higher forces in the apex. Whereas in cylindrical geometry, force load is distributed throughout the implant and, due to the parallel walls of the cylindrical implant, the coronal part of the osteotomy will be damaged by the preceding implant threads [ 10 ]. In the literature, tapered implants show a greater possibility of attaining initial fixation than cylindrical implants [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%