2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/434/1/012024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between corona and dielectric barrier discharges plasma using of pin to single and dual ring electrodes configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major advantage of this system is that it does not require an electrode similar to DBD or jet plasma system (Kopuk et al., 2022). Corona discharge plasma system has more applications in the textile industry, environment, and medical use (Sumariyah et al., 2018). Corona plasma is the stream of charged particles, including ions and electrons, accelerated by an electric field at atmospheric pressure.…”
Section: Technology and Mechanisms Of Hv‐cap In Protein Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of this system is that it does not require an electrode similar to DBD or jet plasma system (Kopuk et al., 2022). Corona discharge plasma system has more applications in the textile industry, environment, and medical use (Sumariyah et al., 2018). Corona plasma is the stream of charged particles, including ions and electrons, accelerated by an electric field at atmospheric pressure.…”
Section: Technology and Mechanisms Of Hv‐cap In Protein Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At an initial concentration of 10 mg/l, 84% removal was achieved in 0.5 hours, oxidation of ammonia was tested with aeration maximizing removal by 4.5 to 9 times more than oxidation without aeration. Sumariyah et al [72] explained the difference between DBD and CD. The current ion saturation flow in the corona discharge system is more than the flow of dielectric barrier discharges.…”
Section: Biological Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K is a dimensional constant which is determined experimentally. In essence of the equation (1) and equation (2), By comparing the linear dependence of I/V versus V and I 1/2 versus V, Ferreira et al [5] found that for negative corona discharges equation (2) performs better in all the inter-electrode ranges than equation 1, and equation (2) may hold only when the interelectrode distance is greater than 15 mm. All these indicate the existence of some inconsistencies in the applications of the formula mentioned and that there were still no determinate answers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%