2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03982-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with recent literature on the overall importance of GT (Barootchi et al, 2020; Cairo, Cortellini, et al, 2020; Zuhr et al, 2020), our findings also corroborate the use of grafting materials, such as xenogeneic collagen or acellular dermal matrices, for the treatment of gingival recessions (Stefanini et al, 2020; Suzuki et al, 2020; Meza‐Mauricio et al, 2021). While augmentation of KTW is a prerogative of autogenous grafts, there is no doubt that graft substitutes can provide a significant increase in GT (Tonetti et al, 2018; Rotundo et al, 2019; Tavelli, McGuire, et al, 2020; Zucchelli et al, 2020), which we noted to be qualitatively unchanged over time, in line with a previous systematic review (Barootchi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In line with recent literature on the overall importance of GT (Barootchi et al, 2020; Cairo, Cortellini, et al, 2020; Zuhr et al, 2020), our findings also corroborate the use of grafting materials, such as xenogeneic collagen or acellular dermal matrices, for the treatment of gingival recessions (Stefanini et al, 2020; Suzuki et al, 2020; Meza‐Mauricio et al, 2021). While augmentation of KTW is a prerogative of autogenous grafts, there is no doubt that graft substitutes can provide a significant increase in GT (Tonetti et al, 2018; Rotundo et al, 2019; Tavelli, McGuire, et al, 2020; Zucchelli et al, 2020), which we noted to be qualitatively unchanged over time, in line with a previous systematic review (Barootchi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The direct comparison between the use of XDM as a substitute for CTG in the treatment of GR is limited in the literature 19–21,32 . In addition, there is little evidence of an XDM‐versus‐CTG approach in the context of single RT1 defects 21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical benefits have been shown regarding soft‐tissue phenotype modification around implants and multiple GR treatment by several surgical techniques 14–21 . However, there are few randomized clinical trials (RCTs) supporting the use of XDM to treat single GR 11,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Três estudos (SUZUKI, et al, 2020;MEZA-MAURICIO, et al, 2021;VINCENT-BUGNAS, et al, 2021) CARDAROPOLI, et al, 2012;MCGUIRE, et al, 2016;NAHAS, et al, 2020;BARAKAT, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Quantidade De Anestésicos Medicação Pós-operatória E Tempo D...unclassified
“…Vários estudos na literatura utilizam este questionário para a avaliação do impacto do tratamento cirúrgico de RGs na qualidade de vida do paciente (SANTOS, et al, 2017;TONETTI, et al, 2018;MICHEL, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Quantidade De Anestésicos Medicação Pós-operatória E Tempo D...unclassified