2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5091886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison analysis of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V produced by metallurgical and 3D printing method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The material mechanical properties, and above all the Young's modulus, are of great importance due to the calculation results under static and variable loads by the means of analytical and numerical methods [21][22][23]. The vast majority of structural components are designed for the extent to which Hooke's law applies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material mechanical properties, and above all the Young's modulus, are of great importance due to the calculation results under static and variable loads by the means of analytical and numerical methods [21][22][23]. The vast majority of structural components are designed for the extent to which Hooke's law applies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ti6Al4V titanium alloy ( Table 1 ), is a construction material that is popular due to its low density and high strength as compared to steel materials, and it is widely described in the literature in terms of both its mechanical characteristics [ 14 , 28 , 29 ] and subtractive technologies [ 30 ]. The mechanical properties of the above-mentioned alloy are attributed to its crystalline structure composed of α + β phases, where the coarse grain phase α occurs along with β phases saturated with vanadium and aluminum with locations on the grain boundaries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent cracking during forming the component is heated slightly above room temperature to between 50 C and 100 C. Headplate manufacturing variances are kept to +/-0.1 mm or better on all dimensions to ensure balance of manufacturability and compatibility with the clamping system, maintain consistency throughout the lifetime of the experiment, and to allow high precision placement of the headplate on the animal. It is worth noting that for smaller scale experimentation, headframes can be produced with 3D printing, without any compromises to datum surface registration or rigidity (Karolewska & Ligaj, 2019;Owsiński & Niesłony, 2018). Additionally, if so desired, titanium headframes can be reused by removing them from mice post-mortem and cleaning with commonly used, titanium-compatible solvents such as acetone (Park et al, 2012).…”
Section: Headframementioning
confidence: 99%