11th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation 2011
DOI: 10.1109/epqu.2011.6128934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparision between two stand-alone PV configurations: Series PVs versus series VSCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Switches S 1 and S 2 of the boost converters are represented by the switching states q 1 and q 2 , respectively. The load is star-connected so that the inverter model is given by: (1) where j = a, b, c. In case the load is balanced, voltage v on is given by:…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Switches S 1 and S 2 of the boost converters are represented by the switching states q 1 and q 2 , respectively. The load is star-connected so that the inverter model is given by: (1) where j = a, b, c. In case the load is balanced, voltage v on is given by:…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different topologies have been conceived for handling photovoltaic energy generation. Their choice depends on different criteria such as the number of available PV panels, output signal quality (voltage and current), system efficiency, and managing complexity [1]- [4]. In one of the possible solutions, two power conversion stages are provided, each one using one dc-to-dc boost converter between the PV module and the dc-bus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation