Wind Energy 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-33866-6_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing WAsP and Fluent for Highly Complex Terrain Wind Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[39]) were also conducted using WAsP for a complex orography similar to that in the study area at hand. In addition, WAsP showed the relatively low average error of 5.4% in a direct comparison of different numeric models on the extrapolation of the wind speed in complex terrain [40]. This verifies the applicability of WAsP for the issue investigated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…[39]) were also conducted using WAsP for a complex orography similar to that in the study area at hand. In addition, WAsP showed the relatively low average error of 5.4% in a direct comparison of different numeric models on the extrapolation of the wind speed in complex terrain [40]. This verifies the applicability of WAsP for the issue investigated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In recent years, FLUENT has been widely used in the meteorological field. Li [22,[39][40][41], Cabezón [42], Wei [43], et al studied the wind field simulation over complex terrain using FLUENT.…”
Section: Cfd Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the CFD calculations were performed using Fluent 12.1, a broadly used, general purpose CFD package. Fluent has been used for wind simulations by other authors, and produced results comparable to dedicated wind modelling software [19,20].…”
Section: B Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%