2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0702-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Various Methods of Building Representation for 2D Flood Modelling In Built-Up Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most important aspects to consider in flood modelling of urban environments is the way which the resistance caused by buildings or other structures is represented in the model [22].…”
Section: Urban Drainage Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important aspects to consider in flood modelling of urban environments is the way which the resistance caused by buildings or other structures is represented in the model [22].…”
Section: Urban Drainage Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the dry cells, the water depth and the flow velocity are taken as zeros. In the following equations, the discretisation of the 2D-SWE using the McCormack numerical scheme is obtained in two steps, i.e., a predictor strep in Equation (4) and a corrector step in Equation (5):…”
Section: Flow-r2d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several ways for representing the buildings in the relative literature [4,38]. In order to represent the complexity of the city's infrastructure, due to the fact that the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) is relatively coarse, the computational domain was categorised into two friction zones: (a) the residential area; and (b) the urban open space.…”
Section: Uh Derivation Using Flow-r2dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Bellos and Tsakiris (2015) discussed how to represent roughness effects of buildings in urban areas subject to flooding by carrying out numerical simulations. They tested the performance of their model against three different representations under three different flood hydrographs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%