Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Application 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006170300460054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Usability of User Interfaces for Robotic Telepresence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In piloting, very few participants realised that the same environment layout was being used, so learning effects due to this are likely to be minimal in any case. 3 https://youtu.be/oJFDSp7mYjw…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In piloting, very few participants realised that the same environment layout was being used, so learning effects due to this are likely to be minimal in any case. 3 https://youtu.be/oJFDSp7mYjw…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For waypoint control, the UI must provide a means by which the operator can select target positions and/or orientations for the robot. Targetselection methods used in traditional UIs generally involve clicking a target location on a map (either 2D or 3D) [11,16,19,29], or on an image (or stereoscopic pair of images) from the robotâĂŹs onboard camera [3,6,21,35], using a computer mouse or joystick as an input device. Modern, commerical HMD systems (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%