2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the overlapping of two independent confidence intervals with a single confidence interval for two normal population parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…differences between groups is required (results of such a test are provided in Table A.2). See Maghsoodloo and Huang (2010) for a discussion of this issue and the related literature.…”
Section: Differences Between Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differences between groups is required (results of such a test are provided in Table A.2). See Maghsoodloo and Huang (2010) for a discussion of this issue and the related literature.…”
Section: Differences Between Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown elsewhere that when making statistical inferences from the comparison of confidence (credible) intervals, using 95% intervals is an overly conservative test for statistical differences (Goldstein & Healy, 1995). Rather, attaining a conventional type I error rate of 5% requires the use of approximately 83.5% intervals (Maghsoodloo & Huang, 2010; Payton, Greenstone, & Schenker, 2003). 14 We expect to find no statistically discernible difference in the predicted evaluations for the high‐NFC/low‐NFA type across primes (i.e., a prediction of overlap in the credible intervals).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly simply comparing model estimates, such as among IC50s (dose creating a 50% inhibition of the reaction) and their standard errors or 95% confidence limits for overlap is an unacceptable approach. For a discussion of the relevant issues, refer to Payton and others (Maghsoodloo and Huang, 2010;Payton et al, 2003;Schenker and Gentleman, 2001). For the practicing biomedical scientist, even their exploratory methods have significant limitations including that they require highly technical code to calculate, and are not yet generally accepted.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%