2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02705-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the efficiency of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and diode laser for the treatment of generalized aggressive periodontitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EDTA root surface treatment could remove the smear layer through chelation 25 . As a painless and minimally invasive technique, Er,Cr:YSGG laser has been widely used in oral treatment, such as root surface treatment and soft tissue repair in recent years 26 , 27 . In the control group of our study, 24% EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatments were more effective in improving the state of the root surface, with comparable effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDTA root surface treatment could remove the smear layer through chelation 25 . As a painless and minimally invasive technique, Er,Cr:YSGG laser has been widely used in oral treatment, such as root surface treatment and soft tissue repair in recent years 26 , 27 . In the control group of our study, 24% EDTA and Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatments were more effective in improving the state of the root surface, with comparable effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both laser applications demonstrated benefits in terms of clinical periodontal parameters and levels of gingival-crevicular-fluid cytokines when used in conjunction with SRP. Among the two types of lasers, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser exhibited a more successful outcome for aggressive periodontitis (Er,Cr:YSGG 0.91 mm vs. Diode 0.71 mm) [ 71 ]. Annaji et al combined a laser and aPDT (with one or multiple sessions) and showed superior outcomes in both clinical parameters and pathogen removal (reduction in culture population) at 3 months after SRP + laser + aPDT with multiple sessions [ 72 ].…”
Section: Laser and Photodynamic Therapy (Apdt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diode laser therapies have been shown to be effective for disinfecting implant surfaces and the biostimulation of peri-implant tissues without causing problems in the surrounding tissues because they do not interact with titanium or coated materials [ 7 8 ]. Various studies have evaluated the use of diode lasers in periodontal or peri-implant treatments [ 4 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ]; however, some studies have reported that diode lasers may not provide significant clinical benefits for periodontal disease treatment [ 4 9 13 ]. A recent review by Mattar et al [ 4 ] concluded that the data available in the literature did not support the use of diode lasers for PI therapy, but more studies were needed to confirm this result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%