2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3836-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation via sexual cognitive/behavioral therapy of pelvic floor muscles versus local injection of botulinum toxin on the sexual functioning of patients with primary vaginismus: a randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
38
0
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
38
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…41 The in six domains of the Female Sexual Function Index (botulinum toxin mean differences 0.02-1.57, physiotherapy mean differences 1.07-3.18, P < .001-0.005, refer to Table S1 for outline of full results). 28 In both of the RCTs for vulvodynia, there were no statistically significant inter-group differences between the botulinum toxin group and the saline placebo group. 38,39 Adverse effects from botulinum toxin injections are listed in and two RCTs showed some concerns about risk of bias, 27,38 both in the domain of the randomization process.…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…41 The in six domains of the Female Sexual Function Index (botulinum toxin mean differences 0.02-1.57, physiotherapy mean differences 1.07-3.18, P < .001-0.005, refer to Table S1 for outline of full results). 28 In both of the RCTs for vulvodynia, there were no statistically significant inter-group differences between the botulinum toxin group and the saline placebo group. 38,39 Adverse effects from botulinum toxin injections are listed in and two RCTs showed some concerns about risk of bias, 27,38 both in the domain of the randomization process.…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Information Tables S1 and S2. Definitions of CPP varied among the studies but they could be grouped into two main categories: myofascial hypertonic disorders (three RCTs 11,27,28 and 10 observational studies 19,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], and vulvodynia (two RCTs 38,39 and two observational studies 40,41 ). Given the heterogeneity in case definitions, interventions, metrics, designs, settings and outcome measures, the results from the RCTs could not be pooled into a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Key Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations