DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73499-4_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing State-of-the-Art Collaborative Filtering Systems

Abstract: Abstract. Collaborative filtering aims at helping users find items they should appreciate from huge catalogues. In that field, we can distinguish user-based, item-based and model-based approaches. For each of them, many options play a crucial role for their performances, and in particular the similarity function defined between users or items, the number of neighbors considered for user-or item-based approaches, the number of clusters for model-based approaches using clustering, and the prediction function use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
11

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
93
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommendation is generated according to heuristic or probabilistic methods [16], which are applied to the known ratings in order to predict an unknown rating of a user. Regarding image recommendation, there are useful methodologies and tools which can bring considerable benefits, since they allow users to keep a record of their ratings.…”
Section: Image Recommendation Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recommendation is generated according to heuristic or probabilistic methods [16], which are applied to the known ratings in order to predict an unknown rating of a user. Regarding image recommendation, there are useful methodologies and tools which can bring considerable benefits, since they allow users to keep a record of their ratings.…”
Section: Image Recommendation Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the first place, a collaborative filtering algorithm has been implemented with the best configuration for our use case [16]: the user-based collaborative filtering. Therefore, Pearson correlation (cosine of deviation from the mean) has been used for obtaining the similarities between users (16), and the final predictions have been computed using a weighted sum of deviations from the mean (17): Where v ui is the rating of user u on item i, S u is the set of items rated by user u, and v¡¡ is the mean rating of user u.…”
Section: Improvement Unrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the online phase, the prediction is as follows: [5], incremental training is achieved by using new ratings to update the average parameters (r kl ,ru,r k ,ri,r l ) in equation (3). However, new users or items are not assigned to clusters during the online phase.…”
Section: Incremental Cf Via Co-clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative filtering (CF) uses purchase or rating information to recommend items based on similarity [3]. If two users have liked (or disliked) similar items up to now, it is likely that they will have the same behavior in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But looking at the recommendation techniques used on such web sites shows there is room for innovation. Candillier et al (2007) presents an overview of recommendation techniques. These techniques are either based on internet users notations or content descriptions (userand item-based techniques using collaborative filtering), or based on matching Internet user profiles and content descriptions (content filtering), or based on hybrid techniques combining both approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%