Comparing pre commit reviews and post commit reviews using process simulation

Baum, Tobias; Kortum, Fabian; Schneider, Kurt; Brack, Arthur; Schauder, Jens

doi:10.1145/2904354.2904362

Cited by 11 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, this research uses "convenience sampling" and not probabilistic sampling. 36 It is worth noting that Ahmad et al, 37 Alahyari et al, 38 Baum et al, 39 Crabtree et al, 40 Garousi et al, 41 Graziotin et al, 42 Petersen et al, 43 and Verner et al 44 are some of the works who have used convenience sampling in research in the software development area.…”

Section: Research Context and Sample Profilementioning

confidence: 99%

Agile practices and the promotion of entrepreneurial skills in software development

Tolfo

Wazlawick

Ferreira

et al. 2018

J Software Evolu Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article addresses the relationships between agile development and entrepreneurship. The objective of the study is to verify that the adoption of agile practices can promote entrepreneurial skills in software developers. In this study, agile practices were related to entrepreneurial skills, and developers of the software industry and academia professors were invited to contribute. Questionnaires were sent to the participants to obtain their opinion regarding this research. Participants also opined about the possibility of entrepreneurial skills being an observable behavior in agile culture, ie, if they are visible artifacts of agile culture. As a result, the study found a set of agile practices that promote entrepreneurial skills in software developers. That is, it was found that agile practices promote entrepreneurial behavior in these professionals. These entrepreneurial skills are sustained by the same basic values and assumptions that were learned by developers to resolve internal integration and external adaptation issues during the adoption of agile practices. In this article, an integration model has been adapted from other areas, thereby opening a new field of study involving the relationships between academic research and professional practice on entrepreneurship in the software area and agile development.

show abstract

Section: Research Context and Sample Profilementioning

confidence: 99%

Agile practices and the promotion of entrepreneurial skills in software development

Tolfo

Wazlawick

Ferreira

et al. 2018

J Software Evolu Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yu et al [106], Khandelwal et al [149], Müller et al [107], Balachandran [108], Yang et al [36], Barnett et al [109], Rahman et al [110], Zhang et al [111], Rahman et al [21], Thongtanunam et al [22], Tao and Kim [114], Baum et al [150], Duley et al [117], Peng et al [151], Hannebauer et al [152], Ge et al [119], Zanjani et al [120], Thongtanunam et al [5], Xia et al [128], Ouni et al [6], Menarini et al [131], Xia et al [134], Aman [135], Fejzer et al [136], Fan et al [137], Luna Freire et al [138], Mizuno and Liang [153], Runeson and Wohlin [154], Asthana et al [140], Huang et al [141], Wang et al [142], Huang et al [143], Wen et al [144], Hanam et al [145], Liao et al [146], Jiang et al [147], Guo et al [148] Foundational Study…”

Section: Evaluationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review and Taxonomy of Modern Code Review

Davila,

Nunes

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: Modern Code Review (MCR) is a widely known practice of software quality assurance. However, the existing body of knowledge of MCR is currently not understood as a whole. Objective: Our goal is to identify the state of the art on MCR, providing a structured overview and an in-depth analysis of the research done in this field. Method: We performed a systematic literature review, selecting publications from four digital libraries. Results: A total of 139 papers were selected and analyzed in three main categories. Foundational studies are those that analyze existing or collected data from the adoption of MCR. Proposals consist of techniques and tools to support MCR, while evaluations are studies to assess an approach or compare a set of them. Conclusion: The most represented category is foundational studies, mainly aiming to understand the motivations for adopting MCR, its challenges and benefits, and which influence factors lead to which MCR outcomes. The most common types of proposals are code reviewer recommender and support to code checking. Evaluations of MCR-supporting approaches have been done mostly offline, without involving human subjects. Five main research gaps have been identified, which point out directions for future work in the area.

show abstract

“…In total, ICSSP received 51 submissions from 13 different countries and regions of which 7 were accepted as full research papers (approximately 24%) and another 8 were accepted as short and work‐in‐progress papers (approximately 36%). This special issue contains a selection of research papers from the conference's main track, including the award‐winning paper . The papers included in this issue were ranked highest by reviewers among all the papers submitted to the ICSSP 2016 conference.…”

Section: Icssp 2016mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This special issue contains a selection of research papers from the conference's main track, including the award-winning paper. 8 The papers included in this issue were ranked highest by reviewers among all the papers submitted to the ICSSP 2016 conference.…”

Section: Icssp Main Programmentioning

confidence: 99%