2018
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1527198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing physical activity estimates in children from hip-worn Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers using raw and counts based processing methods

Abstract: This study examined differences in physical activity (PA) estimates provided from raw and counts processing methods. One hundred and sixty-five children (87 girls) wore a hip-mounted ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer for 7 days. Data were available for 129 participants. Time in moderate PA (MPA), vigorous PA (VPA) and moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA) were calculated using R-package GGIR and ActiLife. Participants meeting the wear time criteria for both processing methods were included in the analysis. Time spent in MPA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, AG rather seems to overestimate some epochs. These results are in line with previous research where less MVPA has been captured using an unfiltered acceleration metric compared to AG [33]. Although less MVPA was captured, the amount captured seems to reflect the actual PA better.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, AG rather seems to overestimate some epochs. These results are in line with previous research where less MVPA has been captured using an unfiltered acceleration metric compared to AG [33]. Although less MVPA was captured, the amount captured seems to reflect the actual PA better.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There are reviews that may guide researchers towards the best methodology available , but the choice of method should also be based on the measure of health to be related to. The outcome is highly dependent on what methodology is used, although it might be presented the same way . Therefore, the results of studies with different methodology should be compared with caution.…”
Section: Section 1: Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cut‐points by Butte et al 10 provide PA intensities based on the VMCounts measurements in preschool‐aged children. The more recently developed ENMO measurements offer an open‐source method increasing comparability between studies, and the cut‐points by Hildebrand et al 13,14 have been previously used in children and provide the most reference data 6,19,22 . A previous study in preschoolers 7 reported that cut‐points by Butte et al 10 led to less sedentary time (SED) and more light PA and MVPA compared to estimates using cut‐points by Janssen et al 23 based on VACounts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%