2020
DOI: 10.1080/07317131.2020.1810442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Open Access Search Tools to Improve Interlibrary Loan Fulfillment Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ResearchGate is a social network for scientists on which authors can upload versions of their papers and make them available publicly (ResearchGate, n.d.). Although Google offers more comprehensive search results than Google Scholar, among the four tools reviewed in this paper, Duffin (2020) found that Google had the highest false-positive rate (13% of article searches conducted by the authors were identified by Google as having an open-access version available when none actually was). Thus, we recommend searching Google after conducting a Google Scholar search for articles with no open-access version identified by a Google Scholar search.…”
Section: Googlementioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ResearchGate is a social network for scientists on which authors can upload versions of their papers and make them available publicly (ResearchGate, n.d.). Although Google offers more comprehensive search results than Google Scholar, among the four tools reviewed in this paper, Duffin (2020) found that Google had the highest false-positive rate (13% of article searches conducted by the authors were identified by Google as having an open-access version available when none actually was). Thus, we recommend searching Google after conducting a Google Scholar search for articles with no open-access version identified by a Google Scholar search.…”
Section: Googlementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Lazy Scholar and the Open Access Button each found a small number (10 and 4, respectively) of open-access articles that Google Scholar did not. Duffin (2020) reported that Google and Google Scholar identified similar rates of open-access articles, but sometimes identified different articles. See Table 1 for a summary of which articles each tool identified open-access versions of.…”
Section: Accessing Open-access Peer-reviewed Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Google Scholar searches websites that "consist primarily of scholarly articles-journal papers, conference papers, technical reports, or their drafts, dissertations, pre-prints, post-prints, or abstracts" and make abstracts or whole texts of articles available (Google Scholar, n.d.). With hundreds of millions of records, Google Scholar is the most comprehensive academic search engine available (Gusenbauer, 2019) and has been found to identify the most open-access articles of all search engines with a low rate of false positives (identifying an article as openly accessible when it is actually not; see Duffin, 2020;Gadd et al, 2019;Schultz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Finally You Might Skim Recent Issues Of Practitioner-focused...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ResearchGate is a social network for scientists on which authors can upload versions of their papers and make them available publicly (ResearchGate, n.d.). Although Google offers more comprehensive search results than Google Scholar, among the four tools reviewed in this paper, Duffin (2020) To begin the search process using Google, go to https://www.google.com. Next, enter the article title (in quotations) into the search bar and select the search button.…”
Section: Ms Lopez Searches For the Eight Peer-reviewed Articles Recom...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open access versions of items requested through ILL are often available for about 25 percent of requests (Baich 2012;Duffin 2020). By loading Unpaywall (https://unpaywall.org) data into the library's link resolver or using InstantILL (https://instantill.org), a version of the Open Access Button that can be built into ILL workflows, libraries can make locating open versions easy for users (Paxton et al 2019).…”
Section: Theory: Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%