2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing nearshore benthic and pelagic prey as mercury sources to lake fish: the importance of prey quality and mercury content

Abstract: Mercury (Hg) bioaccumulation in fish poses well-known health risks to wildlife and humans through fish consumption. Yet fish Hg concentrations are highly variable, and key factors driving this variability remain unclear. One little studied source of variation is the influence of habitat-specific feeding on Hg accumulation in lake fish. However, this is likely important because most lake fish feed in multiple habitats during their lives, and the Hg and caloric content of prey from different habitats can differ.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(158 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both grow quickly until maturation, suggesting high pelagic zooplankton consumption and high metabolic energy demand. The putatively lower per unit energy content of zooplankton compared to benthic macroinvertebrates, and subsequently increased consumption, may further enhance their exposure compared to benthic morphs (Karimi et al, 2016). Zooplankton foraging also requires more active swimming to capture evasive prey compared to foraging on more sedentary benthic prey, increasing the metabolic cost for pelagic morph (Trudel et al, 2001).…”
Section: Pelagic Whitefish Morphs Have Higher Thg Than Benthic Ones (H2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both grow quickly until maturation, suggesting high pelagic zooplankton consumption and high metabolic energy demand. The putatively lower per unit energy content of zooplankton compared to benthic macroinvertebrates, and subsequently increased consumption, may further enhance their exposure compared to benthic morphs (Karimi et al, 2016). Zooplankton foraging also requires more active swimming to capture evasive prey compared to foraging on more sedentary benthic prey, increasing the metabolic cost for pelagic morph (Trudel et al, 2001).…”
Section: Pelagic Whitefish Morphs Have Higher Thg Than Benthic Ones (H2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the transport of methylmercury to fish in high-latitude lakes (Chételat and Amyot, 2009;Kahilainen et al, 2016a). Despite the low mercury content of individual Daphnia, planktivorous fish may consume thousands of individuals per day, potentially explaining their prominent role in mercury transfer pathways (Karimi et al, 2016). In contrast, benthic macroinvertebrates have a broad range of foraging guilds, resulting in differential uptake, complicating mercury transfer processes to fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1978, Karimi et al 2016) also affect MeHg bioaccumulation. Assimilation of inorganic forms of dietary Hg, on the other hand, is thought to be negligible (<15%) given the much faster turnover rate of assimilated inorganic Hg compared to MeHg (Dutton and Fisher 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, MeHg bioaccumulation is the net result of interacting physiological processes and environmental factors. In particular the feedbacks between dietary intake, growth, and MeHg bioaccumulation are still insufficiently understood (Braune 1987, Doyon et al 1998, Karimi et al 2016). Such knowledge would arguably improve the interpretation of MeHg patterns in wild fish populations, particularly when patterns are compared across large geographic regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MeHg in lake water can bioaccumulate to concentrations in predator fish over one million‐fold higher than their ambient waters [ Davis et al ., ]. Plankton dynamics and trophic bioaccumulation pathways can also influence MeHg concentrations in top trophic‐level fish [ Stewart et al ., ; Karimi et al ., ]. Many studies have attempted to find correlations between fish MeHg concentrations and physical and chemical lake characteristics, and parameters such as lake morphology [ Mason and Sveinsdóttir , ] and mercury levels in zooplankton [ Chen et al ., ] have been found to be of primary importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%