2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2006.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing metropolitan governance: The cases of Montreal and Toronto

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the success of the use of ICT in urban planning context, depends on to be considered as a resilient path ahead, requiring, in many cases, a longterm approach which cannot be achieved immediately. Thus, the importance of ICT in urban planning at the local level is based on the "capacity for innovation and is part of the collective decision-making system" [23].…”
Section: Ict Tool For Intelligent Urban Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the success of the use of ICT in urban planning context, depends on to be considered as a resilient path ahead, requiring, in many cases, a longterm approach which cannot be achieved immediately. Thus, the importance of ICT in urban planning at the local level is based on the "capacity for innovation and is part of the collective decision-making system" [23].…”
Section: Ict Tool For Intelligent Urban Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upgrades to the built environment, targeted marketing investments, and capacity-building programmes became the assets underpinning spatial strategies (Boudreau, Hamel, Jouve, & Keil, 2006). They marked a change with existing practices, and were introduced at a moment when the City of Montreal no longer seemed able to deliver the urban and infrastructural services it was supposed to provide (Boudreau et al, 2006).…”
Section: Emerging Spatial Strategies Under Neoliberalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upgrades to the built environment, targeted marketing investments, and capacity-building programmes became the assets underpinning spatial strategies (Boudreau, Hamel, Jouve, & Keil, 2006). They marked a change with existing practices, and were introduced at a moment when the City of Montreal no longer seemed able to deliver the urban and infrastructural services it was supposed to provide (Boudreau et al, 2006). The new strategies aimed to integrate all government levels and a number of private actors in a double territorial logic of economic 'tertiarisation' or the replacement of industrial activities by financial services in the inner city on the one hand, and localisation of knowledge economy enterprises at the metropolitan scale on the other.…”
Section: Emerging Spatial Strategies Under Neoliberalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was -and continues to be -little participation in this by civic groups or citizens, who were more focused on the contested local institutional changes of the territorial reform, and continue to be focused on community development in neighbourhoods or on contested urban projects and infrastructures (Boudreau et al 2006, Fontan et al 2009). On the one hand, the local living environment (or the community) may often be more crucial for residents, the city-region making more sense to 'experts'.…”
Section: Governance and Participation In The Montreal City-regionmentioning
confidence: 99%