2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing methods to collect saliva from children to analyze cytokines related to allergic inflammation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While information on the acceptability and feasibility of salivary cortisol collection in community samples of children is limited, research conducted in other populations and with other biomarkers provides additional insight that may be used to improve salivary cortisol collection methods. In a study comparing saliva collection methods for inflammatory cytokines, researchers found that children age 9–17 years preferred the oral swab method to passive drool, reporting oral swabs were quicker and easier to use (Hiremath et al, ). In a qualitative study of parental receptivity to child biomarker testing for tobacco smoke, researchers found that opposition to testing was associated with reluctance to cause short‐term discomfort, perceived powerlessness, and mistrust of research (Rosen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While information on the acceptability and feasibility of salivary cortisol collection in community samples of children is limited, research conducted in other populations and with other biomarkers provides additional insight that may be used to improve salivary cortisol collection methods. In a study comparing saliva collection methods for inflammatory cytokines, researchers found that children age 9–17 years preferred the oral swab method to passive drool, reporting oral swabs were quicker and easier to use (Hiremath et al, ). In a qualitative study of parental receptivity to child biomarker testing for tobacco smoke, researchers found that opposition to testing was associated with reluctance to cause short‐term discomfort, perceived powerlessness, and mistrust of research (Rosen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next‐generation enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to evaluate levels of four cytokines in infant saliva: C‐X‐C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)‐10, interleukin (IL)‐18, IL‐6, and IL‐8. These analytes were selected based on their bioavailability in saliva, and their potential relevance to allergic conditions 18,19 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analytes were selected based on their bioavailability in saliva, and their potential relevance to allergic conditions. 18,19…”
Section: Cytokine Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notable clinical features of saliva include its ease of collection and non-invasive accessibility. Indeed, saliva is widely used for measuring the concentrations of hormones, cytokines, and other physiological active substances (Nie et al 2014;Hiremath et al 2015;Langie et al 2016). Salivation in the oral cavity is induced as a neural reflex in the body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%