2017
DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing human resource planning models in dentistry: A case study using Canadian Armed Forces dental clinics

Abstract: The findings reveal differences between estimation models of <1 FTE, with higher estimates produced from the dentist-to-population ratio model. A larger difference was found in clinics with larger populations. The perceived overestimation of dental human resource requirements suggests that changing to a needs-based model may result in cost savings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main characteristics of the 23 selected studies are provided in Table 1. These publications were from 15 different countries across the world: Australia [23], Canada [24], Chile [25], China [26,27], Japan [28], Kuwait [29], India [30], Ireland [31], Malaysia [32,33], Oman [34], Sri Lanka [35], Taiwan [36], Trinidad & Tobago [37], the United Kingdom [38][39][40][41], and the United States of America [42][43][44][45]. Seven studies were based in the WHO American Region, followed by the European (n=5) and Western Pacific Regions (n=4).…”
Section: Main Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main characteristics of the 23 selected studies are provided in Table 1. These publications were from 15 different countries across the world: Australia [23], Canada [24], Chile [25], China [26,27], Japan [28], Kuwait [29], India [30], Ireland [31], Malaysia [32,33], Oman [34], Sri Lanka [35], Taiwan [36], Trinidad & Tobago [37], the United Kingdom [38][39][40][41], and the United States of America [42][43][44][45]. Seven studies were based in the WHO American Region, followed by the European (n=5) and Western Pacific Regions (n=4).…”
Section: Main Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentists were the dominant oral health workforce group modelled across 13 studies [24,25,36,43,44,[26][27][28][29][30][31]34,35]. Five studies considered both dental and allied dental workforce (including therapists, hygienists, clinical technicians, denturists) in the workforce models [32,33,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Main Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of models (n = 11) were most focused on projecting numbers based on supply of dentists (Ahmed et al 2000;Lexomboon and Punyasingh 2000;Tira et al 2003;Teusner and Chrisopoulos 2008;Guthrie et al 2009;Al-Jarallah et al 2010;Cartes-Velásquez 2013;Huang et al 2013;Gallagher et al 2015; US Department of Health and Human Services 2015; Shaw et al 2017). All these models centered on dentists rather than other oral health care workers, and generally staff numbers were the units of estimate rather than whole time equivalent, except for 2 (Huang et al 2013;Shaw et al 2017). The models tended to include an estimate of demand, but this was generally limited to population numbers so that projected supply could be compared with population size as a provider:population ratio.…”
Section: Supply and Demand Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%