2022
DOI: 10.3390/su141710929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Gender Diversity in the Process of Higher-Education Expansion in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the UK for SDG 5

Abstract: Ensuring equal access to affordable higher education for women and men has become a crucial target of the UN’s SDG 5, while gender disparity persists in various systems. This study employed per capita GDP, the gross enrollment ratio (GER), and the gender parity index (GPI) to demonstrate how higher-education systems have expanded, resulting in the transformation of gender parity. We selected Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the UK as research targets, using both cross correlation functions and trend analyses to compa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the analysis of the degree of growth change. The only quantities related to enrollment that other studies can relate to include the number of enrollment or the gross enrollment ratio, but they do not use their chain growth rate as the basic data [74,75]. As a result, other research studies can only deal with the trend, but they do not have a deep grasp of the changes in the growth rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the analysis of the degree of growth change. The only quantities related to enrollment that other studies can relate to include the number of enrollment or the gross enrollment ratio, but they do not use their chain growth rate as the basic data [74,75]. As a result, other research studies can only deal with the trend, but they do not have a deep grasp of the changes in the growth rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of higher education within the elite system is to educate a handful of students to assume leadership positions in society, whereas the mass system has greater technical and vocational elements. The universal system, on the contrary, is more accessible to the wider population and largely takes the form of lifelong education (Chang et al, 2022). The transitions between stages from elite to mass and from mass to universal are not taken for granted as they require both policies and political will to achieve.…”
Section: Trow's Theory (Elite Mass and Universal): Winners And Losersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concepts include "The Boy Turn" (Weaver-Hightower, 2003), "National Scandal" (Weale, 2016), "Lost Boys" (Tienxhi, 2017), the reversed gender gap dilemma (Van Bavel et al, 2018), and "changing gender disparity," which all discuss the lower representation of males in higher education. Although addressing this issue is complicated and needs additional research, some studies have related the current phenomenon to males' poor reading proficiency (Stoet & Geary, 2020), better performance of females in secondary schools (Tienxhi, 2017), and to socioeconomic matters (Chang, Chou, & Chen, 2022). Several authors, like Alam and Saadat (2020), warned the society from the negative consequences of this current phenomenon, arguing that changing gender disparity measures could result in social imbalance and cause severe social problems.…”
Section: Trow's Theory (Elite Mass and Universal): Winners And Losersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of state involvement in innovation development is relatively small, with the majority of budget funds (approximately 95%) being allocated through the public sector to national universities and research institutions (Klavdienko 2017;Borsi 2021). However, the government wields indirect tools to regulate the R&D domain, such as tax incentives, preferential lending, and credit guarantees for small and medium-sized enterprises engaged in research and development activities (Holroyd 2022;Park and Kim 2022;Chang et al 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%