2015
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing four ovarian reserve markers – associations with ovarian response and live births after assisted reproduction

Abstract: AMH improves the ability to estimate live birth rates after assisted reproduction compared with female age alone. AMH, AFC and age together constituted the best model for prediction of ovarian response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies, in fact, showed a correlation between AMH and live birth rate after IVF, depending solely on oocyte yield [6,28,29], whereas a recent study suggested that AMH is an independent marker of pregnancy and live births after adjustment for female age and oocyte yield [30]. These somehow conflicting evidences could depend on the complexity of the interaction between age and AMH: age could affect mainly the proportion of follicles switching from the primordial to the recruitable pool, whereas AMH per se could mainly reflect the number of FSHsensitive, recruitable follicles [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies, in fact, showed a correlation between AMH and live birth rate after IVF, depending solely on oocyte yield [6,28,29], whereas a recent study suggested that AMH is an independent marker of pregnancy and live births after adjustment for female age and oocyte yield [30]. These somehow conflicting evidences could depend on the complexity of the interaction between age and AMH: age could affect mainly the proportion of follicles switching from the primordial to the recruitable pool, whereas AMH per se could mainly reflect the number of FSHsensitive, recruitable follicles [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the statistical model developed evidenced that the decrease in plasma AMH concentrations with age is more marked in the low AFC group compared with the high one. In this regard, AFC and AMH are widely used to predict ovarian reserve and ovarian response to controlled stimulation with exogenous gonadotropins for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) treatments (La Marca et al 2007, Aflatoonian et al 2009, Fleming et al 2015; moreover, a better prediction of ovarian responsiveness is achieved when using AMH, AFC, and age together (Brodin et al 2015). Taken together, these results immediately suggest that high AFC and AMH concentrations in the early prepubertal period may represent a precocious marker of the ovarian reserve of a given individual, considering that the quantity and quality of non-growing follicles in the ovary is positively associated with the number of growing follicles, plasma AMH concentrations, and reproductive life-span .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For prediction of poor and excessive response the best model included AMH, AFC and age (c-statistic 0.89). 13 Lauren Z et al found that among 97 women who underwent AMH testing, 32 (33.0%) had elevated AMH levels. Hyperandrogenism was reported by 8 (25.0%) women with elevated AMH and none with AMH concentrations lower than 4.7 ng/mL (P <0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%