2019
DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2019.1707650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing electrophysiological correlates of judgment of learning and feeling of knowing during face-name recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our memory tasks consisted of different types of stimuli and metacognitive judgments are task sensitive. Our results also support previous literature, which showed variations in ERP components based on the types of memory tasks and types of stimuli and differences in the ERP components of metacognitive judgments measured within these distinct tasks 4,[35][36][37] . Thus, relationships between ERPs and metacognitive judgments should also be investigated using different memory tasks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our memory tasks consisted of different types of stimuli and metacognitive judgments are task sensitive. Our results also support previous literature, which showed variations in ERP components based on the types of memory tasks and types of stimuli and differences in the ERP components of metacognitive judgments measured within these distinct tasks 4,[35][36][37] . Thus, relationships between ERPs and metacognitive judgments should also be investigated using different memory tasks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The P200 has been found to be related to different cognitive functions, including working and short-term memory 92 , the similarity effect, coding, rehearsal 93 and perceptual processing 35 . Previous ERP studies [35][36][37] P300 and metacognition. The P300 has been found to be related to various memory processes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The neural mechanism results from the JOL task would provide valuable evidence for investigating EOL judgments' brain regions. Previous studies have explored a large number of brain regions related to the JOL task, including the prefrontal cortex, temporal cortex, occipital cortex, and angular gyrus (Cosentino et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2015;Hu et al, 2017;Tsalas et al, 2018;Gaynor and Chua, 2019;Irak et al, 2019Irak et al, , 2020d'Oleire Uquillas et al, 2020;Kelley et al, 2020;Undorf et al, 2020). Furthermore, Vaccaro and Fleming (2018) used a meta-analysis to find that prospective metacognitive monitoring involved the posterior medial prefrontal cortex, the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the right inferior frontal gyrus, and the right insula, which would provide some evidence for EOL judgments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%