2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5128344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing domain wall synapse with other non volatile memory devices for on-chip learning in analog hardware neural network

Abstract: Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) and Phase Change Memory (PCM) devices have been popularly used as synapses in crossbar array based analog Neural Network (NN) circuit to achieve more energy and time efficient data classification compared to conventional computers. Here we demonstrate the advantages of recently proposed spin orbit torque driven Domain Wall (DW) device as synapse compared to the RRAM and PCM devices with respect to on-chip learning (training in hardware) in such NN. Synaptic characteristic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three-terminal domain-wall synapse device used here is based on the heavy metal/ferromagnetic metal hetero-structure, which exhibits perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), as shown in figure 1(a) [12,13,15,16,26,[41][42][43][44]. When in-plane 'write' current flows through the heavy-metal layer ('write' path, from terminal T3 to T1 in figure 1(a)), the domain wall present in the ferromagnetic free layer above it moves due to spin orbit torque experienced by the magnetic moments of the free layer at the interface with the heavy metal.…”
Section: Operating Principle Of the Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three-terminal domain-wall synapse device used here is based on the heavy metal/ferromagnetic metal hetero-structure, which exhibits perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), as shown in figure 1(a) [12,13,15,16,26,[41][42][43][44]. When in-plane 'write' current flows through the heavy-metal layer ('write' path, from terminal T3 to T1 in figure 1(a)), the domain wall present in the ferromagnetic free layer above it moves due to spin orbit torque experienced by the magnetic moments of the free layer at the interface with the heavy metal.…”
Section: Operating Principle Of the Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these non-volatile devices, the ferromagnetic domain-wall device (figure 1(a)), essentially a spintronic device, has been shown to provide a faster and more energy-efficient crossbar solution, for on-chip learning (training of the neural network on hardware itself), compared to other non-volatile memory devices, like resistive random access memory (RRAM) devices and phase change memory (PCM) devices [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. This is because the domain-wall device has a much more linear and symmetric conductance response, or synaptic characteristic, compared to that of the RRAM or PCM device [16]. On-chip learning is known to provide several advantages for edge devices in terms of data security and the like [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also assume an interfacial Dzyalonshinskii Moriya Interaction (DMI) strength of 1.2 mJ/m 2 due to which the domain wall acquires Neel-type chirality. These simulation parameters have also been used in the experimentally benchmarked micromagnetic study of the heavy-metal/ferromagnet-bilayer device we consider here [21], [22], [46]. Fig.…”
Section: Device-level Study: Comparison Of Domain-wall Velocities In Ferrimagnetic and Ferromagnetic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the device variability is a persistent issue for all of the above-mentioned devices, recent work in fully connected artificial neural network (ANN) [8] shows equivalent accuracy to software-based training. Unfortunately, PCRAM and RRAM based devices consume energy on the order of a few pJs per synaptic weight alteration event [9]. Hence, the future IoTs and edge-devices where power is limited will necessitate alternate neuromorphic hardware that are energy efficient and enable real time programing of synaptic weights so the networks can be trained in-situ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, nanomagnet based synaptic devices has shown potential to be energy efficient compared to PCRAM and RRAM [9,10,11]. Among nanomagnet based neuromorphic devices, domain wall (DW) based MTJs are one of the most promising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%