2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing disturbance gradients and bird-based indices of biotic integrity for ranking the ecological integrity of Great Lakes coastal wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coastal wetland ecosystems follow distinct distributions corresponding to environmental gradients (Bantilan-Smith et al 2009;Chin et al 2015). It is critical to establish stable vegetation patterns to lessen the negative impacts of human and natural factors on biodiversity conservation in coastal wetlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coastal wetland ecosystems follow distinct distributions corresponding to environmental gradients (Bantilan-Smith et al 2009;Chin et al 2015). It is critical to establish stable vegetation patterns to lessen the negative impacts of human and natural factors on biodiversity conservation in coastal wetlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method typically uses presence/absence or abundances of individual species (e.g., Gnass Giese et al 2015), but also can incorporate multi-species abundances or species richness variables as long as they are specifically linked with a stressor of interest. Smith-Cartwright and Chow-Fraser (2011) and Chin et al (2015) suggested that the disturbance gradient and indicator approach of Howe et al (2007a, b) is superior to that of EC and CLOCA (2004), Crewe and Timmermans (2005), and to that of DeLuca et al (2004) for assessing ecological integrity of Great Lakes coastal wetlands using bird assemblages. Our recent work also suggested that this may extend to anurans.…”
Section: Anuran-and Bird-based Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach relied on inferring that measurable biotic community attributes are responses to varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance. Since the 1980s, numerous organism-based indicators have been developed or evaluated for several Great Lakes ecosystem types, including coastal wetlands (Burton et al 1999;Herman et al 2001;Simon et al 2001;Wilcox et al 2002;Lougheed and Chow-Fraser 2002;Uzarski et al 2004Uzarski et al , 2005Uzarski et al , 2014Chow-Fraser 2006;Seilheimer and Chow-Fraser 2006;Albert et al 2007;Croft and Chow-Fraser 2007;Howe et al 2007a, b;Niemi et al 2007;Martínez-Crego et al 2010;Grabas et al 2012;Calabro et al 2013;Chin et al 2015). These indicators have been calibrated against both water chemistry attributes and anthropogenic land-use gradients to relate specific biological community characteristics to anthropogenic disturbances across the Great Lakes basin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative indicators have been developed from previous data gathered, as well as from this study. A number of approaches have been used and compared, including an Index of Biotic Integrity ( Crewe and Timmermans 2005 ; GLCWC 2008 ) and a probability-based Indicator of Ecological Condition ( Howe et al 2007 ; Chin et al 2015 ). Both methods are compatible with the field data-collection methods described above.…”
Section: Sampling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%