Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Multimedia - MULTIMEDIA '01 2001
DOI: 10.1145/500160.500163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing discriminating transformations and SVM for learning during multimedia retrieval

Abstract: On-line learning or "relevance feedback" techniques for multimedia information retrieval have been explored from many different points of view: from early heuristic-based feature weighting schemes to recently proposed optimal learning algorithms, probabilistic/Bayesian learning algorithms, boosting techniques, discriminant-EM algorithm, support vector machine, and other kernel-based learning machines. Based on a careful examination of the problem and a detailed analysis of the existing solutions, we propose se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Images similar to the query images can be similar in differing features. (This observation runs counter to the assumption recently made in [34], that similar images are similar in the same way. )…”
Section: Visual Data Mining Resultscontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Images similar to the query images can be similar in differing features. (This observation runs counter to the assumption recently made in [34], that similar images are similar in the same way. )…”
Section: Visual Data Mining Resultscontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Without a doubt, negative examples can provide valuable discriminative information. The question is how to model and utilize them in the right way [41]. (4) Developing more reasonable region weighting schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce this gap, two approaches have been widely used: regionbased features to represent the focus of the user's perceptions of image content [4,8,9,14,19,20,23,29,36,42] and relevance feedback (RF) to learn the user's intentions [2,13,18,21,28,32,34,39,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the statistical machine learning approach, Support Vector Machine (SVM) [19] and the kernel discriminant analysis [2,20,21] are the two most popular approaches used to cluster non-linear data. Both approaches are essentially based on the kernel method to handle the non-linear data.…”
Section: B Support Vector Machine Vs Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%