2021
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2020.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COMPARING DIRECT CARBONATE AND STANDARD GRAPHITE 14C DETERMINATIONS OF BIOGENIC CARBONATES

Abstract: The direct carbonate procedure for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (AMS 14C) dating of submilligram samples of biogenic carbonate without graphitization is becoming widely used in a variety of studies. We compare the results of 153 paired direct carbonate and standard graphite 14C determinations on single specimens of an assortment of biogenic carbonates. A reduced major axis regression shows a strong relationship between direct carbonate and graphite percent Modern Carbon (pMC) values (m = 0.996; 95… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the shells analyzed here did not show visual evidence of heat exposure, and further research is needed to evaluate the potential effects of diagenetic alteration in radiocarbon results. This work illustrates that the rapid and more affordable carbonate-target radiocarbon method proved to be a valid and reliable tool for calculating the age of Holocene archaeological shells, in agreement with previous studies testing the validity of the method and successfully applying it (e.g., Kowalewski et al, 2018;New et al, 2019;Bright et al, 2021).…”
Section: Time Averaging Of Harvested Marine Mollusk Shellssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the shells analyzed here did not show visual evidence of heat exposure, and further research is needed to evaluate the potential effects of diagenetic alteration in radiocarbon results. This work illustrates that the rapid and more affordable carbonate-target radiocarbon method proved to be a valid and reliable tool for calculating the age of Holocene archaeological shells, in agreement with previous studies testing the validity of the method and successfully applying it (e.g., Kowalewski et al, 2018;New et al, 2019;Bright et al, 2021).…”
Section: Time Averaging Of Harvested Marine Mollusk Shellssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The carbonate-target radiocarbon dating is approximately one-third the cost of traditional graphite-target radiocarbon dating. Moreover, for samples that are younger than 10,000 yr old, this method yields statistically indistinguishable results compared with the traditional graphite-target method (Bush et al, 2013;Bright et al, 2021). To test the potential radiocarbon offsets within different layers of the same shell, three shells were selected to assess whether or not the outer and inner aragonitic portion of the same shell would yield statistically equivalent radiocarbon ages.…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating Of Marine Shellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focused on three native bivalve species that were still extant in the study area. Shells were dated by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), using powdered carbonate targets [23,24]. The 149 obtained radiocarbon ages were converted to calendar ages.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Study Area And Current And Historical Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable a rigorous temporal interpretation of the ecological information extracted from time-averaged death assemblages, we quantified their shell age distributions by radiocarbon dating (see Albano et al, 2021). At each station, we dated 10 to 15 valves of common native bivalve species that were also recorded alive in our samples (see Supporting Information Table S1.2 for further details and a list of dated species), using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) of powdered carbonate targets (Bright et al, 2021;Bush et al, 2013). Ages are reported in calendar years before the year of sample collection.…”
Section: Field Sampling and Sample Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%