2016
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing changing neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) levels in intubated and recently extubated neonates

Abstract: Neonates demonstrated an increase in BrP, higher PIP and Edi when extubated from NAVA to NIV NAVA. This is most likely owing to the inefficiencies of NIV ventilation and suggests that neonates require a higher NAVA level when transitioning from NAVA to NIV NAVA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the NAVA level was progressively increased, the peak Edi rapidly decreased to low values and seems to settle at NAVA levels above 2.5 cmH 2 O/μV. This decrease in Edi value was accompanied by an increase in the PIP, as previously described by Firestone et al, 2,3 particularly at low values of NAVA level. As underlined by the authors, the Edi peak remained low and unchanged with NAVA levels between 2.5 and 4 cmH 2 O/μV.…”
Section: E T T E R T O T H E E D I T O Rsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…When the NAVA level was progressively increased, the peak Edi rapidly decreased to low values and seems to settle at NAVA levels above 2.5 cmH 2 O/μV. This decrease in Edi value was accompanied by an increase in the PIP, as previously described by Firestone et al, 2,3 particularly at low values of NAVA level. As underlined by the authors, the Edi peak remained low and unchanged with NAVA levels between 2.5 and 4 cmH 2 O/μV.…”
Section: E T T E R T O T H E E D I T O Rsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Combining these two modes resulted in identical pressures (but halved) and opposite in sign positive pressure NAVA (Brander et al, 2009;Firestone, Fisher, Reddy, White, & Stein, 2015;Lecomte et al, 2009;Takahashi et al, 2014). As previously shown with positive pressure NAVA, in both animals and humans (including premature infants (Firestone et al, 2015;LoVerde, Firestone, & Stein, 2016), the usual physiological response to increasing assist during NAVA is a downregulation of EAdi while the pressure and volume increase initially, followed by a plateau (sometimes referred to as an "adequate NAVA level") where the pressure/tidal volume are intrinsically limited, despite further increases in the NAVA level. This is in contrast to increasing levels of pressure support ventilation, where the targeted pressure (and volume) increase as directed, despite the downregulation of EAdi (Beck et al, 2007).…”
Section: Cnava P− Titrationsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Таким образом, NAVA обладает самым быстрым и чувстви-тельным триггером, который начинает поддержку вдоха одновременно с началом сокращения дыхательных мышц пациента. При этом сигнал дыхательного центра распознается аппаратом ИВЛ даже в случае минимального сокращения дыхательной мускулатуры [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified