2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forests are the largest terrestrial ecosystems that supply water; however, forests with the highest vegetation density have the highest actual transpiration rates [26]. Therefore, the potential of forests in providing water resources is lower than other land cover types.…”
Section: The Concept Of Forest Water Supply and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Forests are the largest terrestrial ecosystems that supply water; however, forests with the highest vegetation density have the highest actual transpiration rates [26]. Therefore, the potential of forests in providing water resources is lower than other land cover types.…”
Section: The Concept Of Forest Water Supply and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the water resource means the total amount as a static concept, and the water supply and water yield can be understood as the quantity supplied as a dynamic concept [1,3,8,26,27]. Specifically, water yield is theoretically included in the water supply and is effective for expressing the amount of water supplied [26,27]. Forest water yield is a concept for quantifying a forest's functionality of providing water resources.…”
Section: The Concept Of Forest Water Supply and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users commit to sharing data, thus contributing to the growth of the system over time [58]. Given the innovative nature of the tool, a relatively limited number of studies have so far been published [59] and, with just a few exceptions (e.g., the pilot assessment of ES in the Tecchio and Mergola watersheds, in Molise), none of them refer to Italian case studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, some studies have compared InVEST with other modeling tools; however, few refer to empirical investigations. Bagstad et al (2013) have compared the modeling results of InVEST and ARIES in an empirical study in Arizona, which revealed that the divergence degrees between the results of the two tools are different in distinct modeling scenarios. Another empirical study has compared SWAT and InVEST relevant to the modeling of water yield and nutrient export.…”
Section: Limitations Of Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%