Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conferen 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d19-1489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing and Developing Tools to Measure the Readability of Domain-Specific Texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Text structure. We first adopt three readability metrics that have been widely used by other studies [29,64] for measuring the document readability, namely Automated Readability Index (ARI), Flesch Readability Ease Score (FRES), and Laesbarheds Index (LIX). The first metric, i.e., ARI, is used to assess the required reader's education level to understand a document, and the other two, i.e., FRES and LIX, assess the difficulty level of the document based on its average number of syllables per word, total words, and total sentences.…”
Section: Readability Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Text structure. We first adopt three readability metrics that have been widely used by other studies [29,64] for measuring the document readability, namely Automated Readability Index (ARI), Flesch Readability Ease Score (FRES), and Laesbarheds Index (LIX). The first metric, i.e., ARI, is used to assess the required reader's education level to understand a document, and the other two, i.e., FRES and LIX, assess the difficulty level of the document based on its average number of syllables per word, total words, and total sentences.…”
Section: Readability Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a single, “gold‐standard” technique is yet to be identified, the readability of documents such as privacy policies and medical documents is commonly measured using more than one scoring mechanism (Bowers et al, 2017). Readability scores can be calculated using Microsoft Word Office Package (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA), Readability Calculations (Micro Power & Light Co., Dallas, TX), Readability Studio 1.1 (Oleander Solutions, Vandalia, OH; Badarudeen & Sabharwal, 2010), and Python libraries like TextStat (Gao, 2020; Gao et al, 2020; Kumar et al, 2017; Park et al, 2017; Redmiles et al, 2018) and Readability (Lei & Yan, 2016; Su et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a single, "gold-standard" technique is yet to be identified, the readability of documents such as privacy policies and medical documents is commonly measured using more than one scoring mechanism (Bowers et al, 2017). Readability scores can be calculated (Gao, 2020;Gao et al, 2020;Kumar et al, 2017;Park et al, 2017;Redmiles et al, 2018) and Readability (Lei & Yan, 2016;Su et al, 2019).…”
Section: Readability Of Privacy Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agar siswa mampu memperoleh pemahaman materi dan mencapai kompetensi, perlu memilih dan menyusun buku ajar yang sesuai dengan tingkat kelas (Nassiri, 2023). Tingkat keterbacaan teks bisa menjadi salah satu patokan untuk mengetahui kualitas buku ajar sebagai sumber informasi sesuai dengan tingkat kelas dan kemampuan membaca di setiap kelas (Alarcon, 2020;Gkikas, 2022;Martinc, 2021;Redmiles, 2019), khususnya pada tingkat kelas 9. Sebab, keterbacaan merupakan faktor penting yang berkaitan erat dengan pemahaman.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified