2008
DOI: 10.1787/237833258822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Aggregate Investment Returns in Privately Managed Pension Funds

Abstract: ABSTRACT/RÉSUMÉ Comparing aggregate investment returns in Privately Managed Pension Funds: an initial assessmentThis report presents an initial assessment of the financial performance of privately managed pension funds, both mandatory and voluntary, in Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe, as well as selected OECD countries. It provides a comparative description of private pension funds in the 23 countries included in the report, examining the value assets under management, the weight of investments in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third pillar encourages discretionary savings and is available to anyone who cares to supplement the retirement income provided by the first two pillars, in which case it might be either a privately or publicly managed pension system. While, the model has been introduced in more than 80 countries, only a few of them would qualify today as having a multi-pillar scheme such as that proposed originally by the World Bank (Andrews, 2006 this time, all workers should be covered by the new pension system, while it is assumed that by then the pension fund will be the biggest financial institution measured by assets in Poland (Kowalewski, 2008 While a cross-country study may be preferable, the results could be strongly biased, as differences in reporting and regulatory framework in the pension system are large across countries (Tapia, 2008).…”
Section: The Institutional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third pillar encourages discretionary savings and is available to anyone who cares to supplement the retirement income provided by the first two pillars, in which case it might be either a privately or publicly managed pension system. While, the model has been introduced in more than 80 countries, only a few of them would qualify today as having a multi-pillar scheme such as that proposed originally by the World Bank (Andrews, 2006 this time, all workers should be covered by the new pension system, while it is assumed that by then the pension fund will be the biggest financial institution measured by assets in Poland (Kowalewski, 2008 While a cross-country study may be preferable, the results could be strongly biased, as differences in reporting and regulatory framework in the pension system are large across countries (Tapia, 2008).…”
Section: The Institutional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a cross-country study may be preferable, the results could be strongly biased, as differences in reporting and regulatory framework in the pension system are large across countries (Tapia, 2008).…”
Section: The Institutional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%