2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing a silver-impregnated activated carbon with an unmodified activated carbon for disinfection by-product minimisation and precursor removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the influence of carbon surface tailoring on Brremoval have not been extensively investigated, and very few studies have explored the Brremoval by tailored AC surface at practical adsorbent doses [Watson et al 2016] along with the control of brominated DBPs in natural waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the influence of carbon surface tailoring on Brremoval have not been extensively investigated, and very few studies have explored the Brremoval by tailored AC surface at practical adsorbent doses [Watson et al 2016] along with the control of brominated DBPs in natural waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of activated carbon with the size of particles from 0.1 to 2,000 μm, impregnated with silver, in a complex method for deep water treatment and conditioning is wellknown. The treated water is subjected to preliminary filtering [8]. Silver in the ionic and molecular forms moves into treated/conditioned water, contaminating it [9].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These composite materials have shown high adsorption affinities for contaminant species including heavy metals, halides and DOM. The removal efficiency for bromide and iodide for native and silver impregnated AC was compared, with results showing a far superior removal of bromide by the silver impregnated material (95% as compared to 26% for native AC) [68]. This material also showed an improved efficiency for the removal of total dissolved organic carbon when used in conjunction with an enhanced coagulation process (77% as compared to 67%).…”
Section: Chemical Modifications Of Activated Carbon For Improved Contmentioning
confidence: 99%