2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00236.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative yield of HCV RNA testing in blood donors screened by 2.0 versus 3.0 antibody assays

Abstract: EIA3 would have detected the majority of RNA-positive donations missed by EIA2. Some RNA-positive donors are EIA2-negative and EIA3-reactive for a prolonged period of time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although studies of HIV-infected [13] and HIV-uninfected [24,25] individuals suggest that the HCV EIA 3.0 is a more sensitive assay, our findings of a low prevalence of seronegative HCV infection among anti-HCV-negative subjects suggest that the HCV EIA 2.0, which remains the standard clinical HCV screening assay used at most large hospital laboratories and at most of our institutions, is a reasonable screening tool to use for HIV-infected populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although studies of HIV-infected [13] and HIV-uninfected [24,25] individuals suggest that the HCV EIA 3.0 is a more sensitive assay, our findings of a low prevalence of seronegative HCV infection among anti-HCV-negative subjects suggest that the HCV EIA 2.0, which remains the standard clinical HCV screening assay used at most large hospital laboratories and at most of our institutions, is a reasonable screening tool to use for HIV-infected populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This depends on the generation of HCV ELISA assay used, which, unfortunately, the USRDS database did not indicate. The largest study that has so far compared the sensitivity of HCV ELISA for HCV RNA found that 1 in 134,000 donations were RNA positive and ELISA 2.0 negative, compared with 1 in 540,000 donations that were RNA positive and ELISA 3.0 negative (P ϭ 0.001) (44). The specificity of HCV ELISA 3.0 in blood donors is 99.7% (45), similar to ELISA 2.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The Ortho HCV Version 3.0 test is a direct solid-phase EIA and some reports have shown that it has improved sensitivity (99%) and specificity (99.9%) as it includes the core and the non-structural (NS) genome regions of HCV NS3, NS4 and NS5. 7 Positive and negative controls are supplied by the manufacturer. Reactions were read at 492 nm using a spectrophotometer and the absorbance of each well recorded.…”
Section: Serologymentioning
confidence: 99%