1996
DOI: 10.2307/3515116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Taphonomy of Modern and Pleistocene Corals, San Salvador, Bahamas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed the degree of taphonomic degradation of the coral material (encrustation, surficial erosion, and internal boring) using a modified version of the rank scales employed by Greenstein and Moffat (1996) for Acropora cervicornis in The Bahamas. The taphonomic condition of each coral fragment was rated as good, intermediate, or poor based on the most degraded portion of the fragment.…”
Section: Coring Procedures and Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assessed the degree of taphonomic degradation of the coral material (encrustation, surficial erosion, and internal boring) using a modified version of the rank scales employed by Greenstein and Moffat (1996) for Acropora cervicornis in The Bahamas. The taphonomic condition of each coral fragment was rated as good, intermediate, or poor based on the most degraded portion of the fragment.…”
Section: Coring Procedures and Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cervicornis observed in Bahia Almirante (and Belize) grew with tissue covering the entirety of the branches. The taphonomy of this species could, therefore, be used to infer the rapidity of burial and the degree of transport, assuming that it grew in a similar manner in the past (Greenstein and Moffat 1996). The layers of Ac.…”
Section: Transport Degradation and Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the degree of taphonomic degradation of the coral material-encrustation, surficial erosion, and internal excavation-using a modified version of the rank scales employed by Greenstein and Moffat (1996) for Acropora cervicornis in the Bahamas. The taphonomic condition of each coral fragment was rated as good, intermediate or poor based on the most degraded portion of the fragment.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the manner described previously by Wapnick et al (2004), we assessed the degree of taphonomic degradation of the Acropora cervicornis material-encrustation, surfi cial erosion, and internal boring-using a modifi ed version of the rank scales of Greenstein and Moffat (1996). The average taphonomic condition of each coral fragment was rated as good, intermediate, or poor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constituents of each interval retained on a 5 mm sieve were cleaned of matrix, sorted to species, dried to a constant mass, and weighed to the nearest milligram. In earlier studies, we showed from regression analysis that, for the coral constituents, log(mass) was a strong predictor of log(volume), as measured by water displacement.In the manner described previously by Wapnick et al (2004), we assessed the degree of taphonomic degradation of the Acropora cervicornis material-encrustation, surfi cial erosion, and internal boring-using a modifi ed version of the rank scales of Greenstein and Moffat (1996). The average taphonomic condition of each coral fragment was rated as good, intermediate, or poor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%