2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703743104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative support for the niche variation hypothesis that more generalized populations also are more heterogeneous

Abstract: There is extensive evidence that some species of ecological generalists, which use a wide diversity of resources, are in fact heterogeneous collections of relatively specialized individuals. This within-population variation, or ''individual specialization,'' is a key requirement for frequency-dependent interactions that may drive a variety of types of evolutionary diversification and may influence the population dynamics and ecological interactions of species. Consequently, it is important to understand when i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

41
455
4
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(523 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(71 reference statements)
41
455
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…When combined with health and disease indices, these longitudinal studies can elucidate the disease outcomes related to individual behavioral strategies, an approach well established in human epidemiology. Given the growing recognition of individual behavioral specialization strategies in many taxa (29), the methods used here have broad potential utility for better understanding the causes and consequences of disease in wildlife populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined with health and disease indices, these longitudinal studies can elucidate the disease outcomes related to individual behavioral strategies, an approach well established in human epidemiology. Given the growing recognition of individual behavioral specialization strategies in many taxa (29), the methods used here have broad potential utility for better understanding the causes and consequences of disease in wildlife populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eliminado: mentioned Niche variation in the biofilm community was assessed using stable isotopes under a similar conceptual basis as Bolnick et al (, 2007) . We used six community-level metrics described by Layman et al (, 2007), briefly: 1) δ 13 C range (CR), which indicates the quantity of basal resources and niche diversification at the base of the food web, 2) δ 15 N range (NR), which shows the degree of trophic diversity, 3) total area (TA), which reflects the amount of niche space occupied by a community, 4) mean distance to centroid (CD), which shows the overall degree of trophic diversity, and is specially useful in cases with outlier species, 5) mean nearest neighbour distance (NND), which is a proxy of trophic redundancy and 6) standard deviation of the nearest neighbour distance (SDNND), which indicates the evenness of the distribution of trophic niches in a community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If so, do species with higher morphological diversity (e.g., greater intraspecific variation) have wider trophic niches? Issues similar to the latter have been discussed by Dennison & Baker (1991) and Griffen & Mosblack (2011), who studied the morphology of birds and crabs, respectively, and Bolnick et al (2007), who analyzed temperate fish and noted that generalized populations exhibit more niche variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%