2020
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1801780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study on the Biological Effects of Sodium Citrate-Based and Apigenin-Based Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, 12.9 ± 4.5 nm AgNPs, prepared from silver nitrate, sodium citrate and ascorbic acid, tested against E. coli (MG 1655) and S. aureus (ATCC 6538) led to the determination of MBC of 0.14 mg/mL (i.e., 1.3 µM) and 0.35 mg/mL (3.2 µM) respectively [ 41 ]; whereas AgNPs ranging from 1 to 20 nm facing E. coli (ATCC 25922) and S. aureus (ATCC 12600) resulted in MIC of 0.049 mg/mL (i.e., ≈454 µM) and 0.391 mg/mL (i.e., 3625 µM) [ 42 ]. The differences observed with our results can be attributed to the AgNPs large size distribution [ 40 , 43 ], the presence of an antibacterial agent in the NPs preparation procedure [ 41 ], or the selection of different bacteria strains and concentration range (more specifically when S. aureus is under consideration) [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that MIC values obtained for our AgNPs against E. coli are in good agreement with those from other studies [ 40 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, 12.9 ± 4.5 nm AgNPs, prepared from silver nitrate, sodium citrate and ascorbic acid, tested against E. coli (MG 1655) and S. aureus (ATCC 6538) led to the determination of MBC of 0.14 mg/mL (i.e., 1.3 µM) and 0.35 mg/mL (3.2 µM) respectively [ 41 ]; whereas AgNPs ranging from 1 to 20 nm facing E. coli (ATCC 25922) and S. aureus (ATCC 12600) resulted in MIC of 0.049 mg/mL (i.e., ≈454 µM) and 0.391 mg/mL (i.e., 3625 µM) [ 42 ]. The differences observed with our results can be attributed to the AgNPs large size distribution [ 40 , 43 ], the presence of an antibacterial agent in the NPs preparation procedure [ 41 ], or the selection of different bacteria strains and concentration range (more specifically when S. aureus is under consideration) [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that MIC values obtained for our AgNPs against E. coli are in good agreement with those from other studies [ 40 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For example, minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of 9.94 µg/mL (i.e., ≈92 µM of metal) and 19.88 µg/mL (i.e., ≈184 µM) were obtained by C. Quintero-Quiroz et al, for AgNPs (5-50 nm) against E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATCC 29213, respectively [40]. However, with AgNPs of 95.5 nm in diameter (large size distribution) facing the same strains, M. Zarei et al, reported no antibacterial activity against E. coli, while they determined a MIC of 5 µg/mL (i.e., ≈46 µM of metal) against S. aureus [43]. Moreover, 12.9 ± 4.5 nm AgNPs, prepared from silver nitrate, sodium citrate and ascorbic acid, tested against E. coli (MG 1655) and S. aureus (ATCC 6538) led to the determination of MBC of 0.14 mg/mL (i.e., 1.3 µM) and 0.35 mg/mL (3.2 µM) respectively [41]; whereas AgNPs ranging from 1 to 20 nm facing E. coli (ATCC 25922) and S. aureus (ATCC 12600) resulted in MIC of 0.049 mg/mL (i.e., ≈454 µM) and 0.391 mg/mL (i.e., 3625 µM) [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green production of metal-oxide NPs utilizing biomass constituents is appealing because these methods are uncomplicated, cheap, and non-toxic compared to chemico-physical procedures [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. The current study reports the extracellular synthesis of A/ZnO-NPs via fungi.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, cancers are the cause of many deaths. So far, various research studies have been carried out on different cancer cells such as U87, MCF7, and other different cancer cell lines [3739]. According to the World Health Organisation report, liver cancer has become one of the lethal agents in the world [40].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%