2003
DOI: 10.3233/ies-2003-0111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of two isokinetics dynamometers: CYBEX NORM vs CON-TREX MJ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability and validity of the dynamometer have been confirmed in a previous study (Cotte and Ferret, 2003). Previous studies (Muramatsu et al, 2001;Maganaris et al, 2002) reported that large torque production induced inevitable rotation in the plantar flexion direction during isometric plantar flexion.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The reliability and validity of the dynamometer have been confirmed in a previous study (Cotte and Ferret, 2003). Previous studies (Muramatsu et al, 2001;Maganaris et al, 2002) reported that large torque production induced inevitable rotation in the plantar flexion direction during isometric plantar flexion.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…, 1996; Dauty & Rochcongar, 2001) and Cybex II (Gross et al. , 1991) or comparing the Cybex NORM with the Con‐Trex MJ (Cotte & Ferret, 2003; Bardis et al. , 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isokinetic devices assess joint and muscle maximal concentric (CON), eccentric (ECC) and isometric (ISO) strength under constant velocities throughout the whole range of motion. Several studies have used isokinetic dynamometers to assess ISO and dynamic (CON and ECC) strength of the knee extensor and flexor muscles ( Bardis et al, 2004 ; Cotte and Ferret, 2003 ). Isokinetic devices are not only used in rehabilitation and sports medicine to assess risk factors such as low strength muscles but also in developing rehabilitation programmes for knee and hamstring injuries or imbalances ( Croisier, 2004 ; Dauty et al, 2003 ; Impellizzeri et al, 2008 ; Kannus, 1994 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%