Comparative study of two analytical methods to the determination of boron in leachate samples from sanitary landfills and groundwater for routine analysis and feasible on-site environmental monitoring

A critical review on the determination of boron in various matrices

“…Palma et al [19] compared ICP-OES and azomethine-H UV-Vis methods for the determination of boron in leachate samples from sanitary landfills and groundwater. The two methods were evaluated by considering their analytical characteristics and applicability.…”

“…The authors also studied the effect of sample digestion process on the results and showed that sample preparation in a closed system increase the accuracy of the results. Palma et al [19] compared ICP-OES and azomethine-H UV-Vis methods for the determination of boron in leachate samples from sanitary landfills and groundwater. The two methods were evaluated by considering their analytical characteristics and applicability.…”

Rapid in situ determination of boron in irrigated waters using a new colorimetric kit

“…Mohammed et al (2014), found a detection coefficient of 0.0514 mg/L but used only 7 points to construct the calibration curve (Mohammed et al, 2014). Palma et al (2016), using the ICP-OES method, and found a detection and quantification limit of 0.025 mg/L and 0.124 mg/L, respectively (Palma et al, 2016). To obtain the detection and quantification limit, we created a graph of concentration vs. standard deviation, obtaining y = -4E-05x + 0.005 as the equation of the line.…”

“…Mohammed et al (2014), found a detection coefficient of 0.0514 mg/L but used only 7 points to construct the calibration curve (Mohammed et al, 2014). Palma et al (2016), using the ICP-OES method, and found a detection and quantification limit of 0.025 mg/L and 0.124 mg/L, respectively (Palma et al, 2016).…”