2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(03)00278-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of thermal decomposition of the sol–gel products of U and Ce by external and internal gelation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one of the most stable plutonium oxidation states is Pu IV (r CN8 = 0.97 Å) and Ce as surrogate has the benefit of being used as Ce IV (r CN8 = 0.96 Å). Suresh Kumar et al [5] tested the IG process for the production of bulk Ce-doped ammonium diuranate (ADU) gels, using Ce III as dopant precursor. Moreover, IG studies to prepare CeO 2 particles are available in literature, they use Ce IV solution, pre-neutralised with NH 3 solution, as metal precursor [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the most stable plutonium oxidation states is Pu IV (r CN8 = 0.97 Å) and Ce as surrogate has the benefit of being used as Ce IV (r CN8 = 0.96 Å). Suresh Kumar et al [5] tested the IG process for the production of bulk Ce-doped ammonium diuranate (ADU) gels, using Ce III as dopant precursor. Moreover, IG studies to prepare CeO 2 particles are available in literature, they use Ce IV solution, pre-neutralised with NH 3 solution, as metal precursor [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies working with internal gelation have assumed, e.g. [58], categorical homogeneity for (U,Ln)O2 IGMS systems but a deviation from a perfect solid solution seems to be possible under a combination of process parameters which were not within the scope of this work. Furthermore such deviations can easily be missed without a careful analysis of the XRD pattern at high 2 angles and the type of detailed internal elemental distribution analysis presented in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%