2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of the performance of the M-cycle counter-flow and cross-flow heat exchangers for indirect evaporative cooling – Paving the path toward sustainable cooling of buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest value of humidity ratio was 0.027 kg kg -1 at the ambient temperature 25°C with 1.5 m s -1 inlet air velocity and the highest value of humidity ratio was 0.038 kg kg -1 at the ambient temperature 40°C with 6.0 m s -1 inlet air velocity. These results agreed with those obtained by Zhan et al [15] whose found the humidity ratio increased with increasing the inlet air temperature.…”
Section: Model Experimentationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest value of humidity ratio was 0.027 kg kg -1 at the ambient temperature 25°C with 1.5 m s -1 inlet air velocity and the highest value of humidity ratio was 0.038 kg kg -1 at the ambient temperature 40°C with 6.0 m s -1 inlet air velocity. These results agreed with those obtained by Zhan et al [15] whose found the humidity ratio increased with increasing the inlet air temperature.…”
Section: Model Experimentationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…There are several researchers have been studied cooling energy, Scientists studied that the cooling energy is a significant part of the energy needed in buildings [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The need for cooling in buildings is increasing due to higher levels of targeted indoor environment in addition to the impacts of the global warming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, if we aim to minimize water consumption, the lowering of the working stream mass flow is the best solution (the cooler consumes less than 1.5 kg w /kWh c ). 8 There is no doubt about the effect of the reduction of the product stream flow on the improvement of the cooler efficiency. For λ = 1:2, the cooler reaches a 115% efficiency (while for λ = 1:1 would lead to 107%), "gaining" 2°C of additional cooling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhan [111] found that for optimum performance, the optimum flow rate ratio of working-to-product air was about 50%, and the dimensionless channel length (ratio of channel length to height) should be between 100 to 300. And it has also been shown to exhibit greater (over 15%) cooling effectiveness, when operated in counter flow configuration compared to cross flow [109].…”
Section: Indirect Evaporative Coolersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the dew point saturation efficiency can be between 55 -85%, however, the wet-bulb efficiency (based on the wet-bulb temperature) can be as 20 The DPEC has been studied by several researchers [98,109,110]. Zhan [111] found that for optimum performance, the optimum flow rate ratio of working-to-product air was about 50%, and the dimensionless channel length (ratio of channel length to height) should be between 100 to 300.…”
Section: Indirect Evaporative Coolersmentioning
confidence: 99%