1996
DOI: 10.1109/20.477544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of MR head designs with abutted vs. overlaid permanent magnet bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that the individual stripe's response is asymmetric and the peak shifts right or left, respectively. The results for MR1, MR2, and DSMR are in a very good agreement with experimental measurements [7], [10]. Within a range of 30% of the track width (about 0.3 m) around the track centric line, PES is proportional to the misregistration , and when the head is aligned with the recorded track.…”
Section: General Principlesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is obvious that the individual stripe's response is asymmetric and the peak shifts right or left, respectively. The results for MR1, MR2, and DSMR are in a very good agreement with experimental measurements [7], [10]. Within a range of 30% of the track width (about 0.3 m) around the track centric line, PES is proportional to the misregistration , and when the head is aligned with the recorded track.…”
Section: General Principlesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…1. This means that the magnetizations scissor from their nominal parallel position, one is at 45 , the other is at 45 The nominal parallel magnetization configuration without sense current flowing is caused by permanent magnet films placed in the off-track wing regions (not shown in the figure) to control the magnetization orientation thus avoiding multidomain formation within the soft films [9], [10]. In Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation