2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of instantaneous frequency based methods for leak detection in pipeline networks

Abstract: This work demonstrates the effectiveness of the instantaneous frequency analysis in detecting a leaks and other features within the network. NHT and DQ allowed for the identification of the approximate location of leaks. The performance TEO is moderate, with Cepstrum being the worst performing method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
53
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, transient pressure wave‐based methods were exploited to detect and locate faults and leakages on different types of water pipes, and it was used to settle multidefects detection and complex pipeline connection situations . But the pressure peaks can potentially damage the pipes . Vibration signals of the pipe shell recorded by accelerometers were used to detect the burst leak signals of plastic water pipes, but the detectable frequency range of accelerometers is very narrow and low so it is not suitable for continuous gas leak signals on steel pipes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among them, transient pressure wave‐based methods were exploited to detect and locate faults and leakages on different types of water pipes, and it was used to settle multidefects detection and complex pipeline connection situations . But the pressure peaks can potentially damage the pipes . Vibration signals of the pipe shell recorded by accelerometers were used to detect the burst leak signals of plastic water pipes, but the detectable frequency range of accelerometers is very narrow and low so it is not suitable for continuous gas leak signals on steel pipes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 But the pressure peaks can potentially damage the pipes. 12 Vibration signals of the pipe shell recorded by accelerometers were used to detect the burst leak signals of plastic water pipes, 13 but the detectable frequency range of accelerometers is very narrow and low so it is not suitable for continuous gas leak signals on steel pipes. AE method has been verified to be efficient to detect leaks on both water pipes and gas pipes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the generated results are compared with the cross-correlation and cepstrum leak detection methods. [6][7][8] There are various types of transient leak detection methods, using different signal processing approaches notably by the Sheffield 9 and Perugia groups. [10][11][12] Leak detection based on the cross-correlation method has been used for leak detection purposes in several studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The errors for identifying the location of leaks, with the flow rates of 0.20, 0.25, 0.30 and 0.40 L/s, were claimed to be less than 0.7%. Ghazali et al 9 studied the analysis of a transient pressure wave in a live water distribution system using a variety of instantaneous frequency (IF) techniques. Methods such as, Hilbert Transform (HT), Normalised Hilbert Transform (NHT), Direct Quadrature (DQ), Teager Energy Operator (TEO) and cepstrum were applied to the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 of 15 induced hydraulic transients can detect and locate leaks within a wide range, but the pressure peaks can potentially damage the pipes [10,16]. Acoustic emission (AE) monitoring has been proven as an effective method for detecting very small leaks over long distances [11,16]; however, its effectiveness may depend on the possibility of artificially amplifying the leak noise by injecting gas or increasing the fluid pressure in the monitored pipes (procedures that are not always allowed during normal operation), and it may be less effective with plastic pipes as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%