2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of CO2 photoreduction using different conformations of CuO photocatalyst: Powder, coating on mesh and thin film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incorporation of CuO have been reported to improve optical performance and to have the potential to facilitate charge migration. 42 Despite the improved optical performance observed, the CuO-HBNs exhibited a modest overall conversion even though the loading composition was higher than RuO 2 -HBNs. This was attributed to the CuO functioning as a recombination centre thereby prohibiting the reaction flow most likely due to the agglomerated relatively large ∼300 nm CuO particles observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The incorporation of CuO have been reported to improve optical performance and to have the potential to facilitate charge migration. 42 Despite the improved optical performance observed, the CuO-HBNs exhibited a modest overall conversion even though the loading composition was higher than RuO 2 -HBNs. This was attributed to the CuO functioning as a recombination centre thereby prohibiting the reaction flow most likely due to the agglomerated relatively large ∼300 nm CuO particles observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where χ, E e and E g represent the Mulliken electronegativity (χ ZnO (5.79 eV), χ CuO (5.81 eV) and χ GCN (4.72 eV)), free electron energy (4.5 vs. NHE) and the energy gap value of individual materials. 29,33,34 To further evaluate the flat-band-potential (E FB ) and semiconducting nature of pure ZnO, CuO, and GCN materials, M-S plots and VB-XPS studies were employed and the achieved outcomes are shown in Fig. 10(a-d).…”
Section: Band Structure Analysis and Mechanistic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon the DRS data, the values of E CB and E VB for ZnO, CuO, and GCN could be calculated by the following equations: 27 E VB = χ − E e + 0.5 E g E CB = E VB − E g where χ , E e and E g represent the Mulliken electronegativity ( χ ZnO (5.79 eV), χ CuO (5.81 eV) and χ GCN (4.72 eV)), free electron energy (4.5 vs. NHE) and the energy gap value of individual materials. 29,33,34 These equations predict that ZnO, CuO, and GCN have E VB values of about 2.97, 2.16, and 1.57 V, respectively. ZnO, CuO, and GCN have E CB values of −0.38, 0.46, and −1.13 V, respectively.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Activity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 To enhance using a greater portion of the solar spectrum energy while maintaining the commendable properties of TiO 2 , 4 various approaches have been proposed, such as introduction of surface heterostructures, 4,5 anion doping, 6,7 loading of metals, [8][9][10] and coupling of small bandgap semiconductors. Composites of Cu x O and TiO 2−x have been reported and used for different photocatalytic applications, such as hydrogen evolution, 11 CO 2 photoreduction 12,13 and photodegradation of volatile organic compounds. 14 The use of renewable energy and anthropogenic CO 2 to generate valuable organic chemicals, including carbonates and polycarbonates, has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%